linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: hughd@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:26:33 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570627C9.5030105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460007464-26726-4-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>



On 07/04/16 15:37, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> follow_huge_(pmd|pud|pgd) functions are used to walk the page table and
> fetch the page struct during 'follow_page_mask' call. There are possible
> race conditions faced by these functions which arise out of simultaneous
> calls of move_pages() and freeing of huge pages. This was fixed partly
> by the previous commit e66f17ff7177 ("mm/hugetlb: take page table lock
> in follow_huge_pmd()") for only PMD based huge pages.
> 
> After implementing similar logic, functions like follow_huge_(pud|pgd)
> are now safe from above mentioned race conditions and also can support
> FOLL_GET. Generic version of the function 'follow_huge_addr' has been
> left as it is and its upto the architecture to decide on it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/hugetlb.c       | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index ffcff53..734182a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1751,6 +1751,19 @@ static inline void pgtable_page_dtor(struct page *page)
>  		NULL: pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address))
>  
>  #if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS

Do we still use USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS? I think its good enough. with pgd's
we are likely to use the same locks and the split nature may not be really
split.

> +static struct page *pgd_to_page(pgd_t *pgd)
> +{
> +	unsigned long mask = ~(PTRS_PER_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t) - 1);
> +
> +	return virt_to_page((void *)((unsigned long) pgd & mask));
> +}
> +
> +static struct page *pud_to_page(pud_t *pud)
> +{
> +	unsigned long mask = ~(PTRS_PER_PUD * sizeof(pud_t) - 1);
> +
> +	return virt_to_page((void *)((unsigned long) pud & mask));
> +}
>  
>  static struct page *pmd_to_page(pmd_t *pmd)
>  {
> @@ -1758,6 +1771,16 @@ static struct page *pmd_to_page(pmd_t *pmd)
>  	return virt_to_page((void *)((unsigned long) pmd & mask));
>  }
>  
> +static inline spinlock_t *pgd_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> +{
> +	return ptlock_ptr(pgd_to_page(pgd));
> +}
> +
> +static inline spinlock_t *pud_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud)
> +{
> +	return ptlock_ptr(pud_to_page(pud));
> +}
> +
>  static inline spinlock_t *pmd_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
>  {
>  	return ptlock_ptr(pmd_to_page(pmd));
> @@ -1783,6 +1806,16 @@ static inline void pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(struct page *page)
>  
>  #else
>  
> +static inline spinlock_t *pgd_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> +{
> +	return &mm->page_table_lock;
> +}
> +
> +static inline spinlock_t *pud_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud)
> +{
> +	return &mm->page_table_lock;
> +}
> +
>  static inline spinlock_t *pmd_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
>  {
>  	return &mm->page_table_lock;
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 5ea3158..e84e479 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4346,21 +4346,70 @@ struct page * __weak
>  follow_huge_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>  		pud_t *pud, int flags)
>  {
> -	if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	return pte_page(*(pte_t *)pud) + ((address & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	struct page *page = NULL;
> +	spinlock_t *ptl;
> +retry:
> +	ptl = pud_lockptr(mm, pud);
> +	spin_lock(ptl);
> +	/*
> +	 * make sure that the address range covered by this pud is not
> +	 * unmapped from other threads.
> +	 */
> +	if (!pud_huge(*pud))
> +		goto out;
> +	if (pud_present(*pud)) {
> +		page = pud_page(*pud) + ((address & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +		if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> +			get_page(page);
> +	} else {
> +		if (is_hugetlb_entry_migration(huge_ptep_get((pte_t *)pud))) {
> +			spin_unlock(ptl);
> +			__migration_entry_wait(mm, (pte_t *)pud, ptl);
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * hwpoisoned entry is treated as no_page_table in
> +		 * follow_page_mask().
> +		 */
> +	}
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock(ptl);
> +	return page;
>  }
>  
>  struct page * __weak
>  follow_huge_pgd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>  		pgd_t *pgd, int flags)
>  {
> -	if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	return pte_page(*(pte_t *)pgd) +
> -				((address & ~PGDIR_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	struct page *page = NULL;
> +	spinlock_t *ptl;
> +retry:
> +	ptl = pgd_lockptr(mm, pgd);
> +	spin_lock(ptl);
> +	/*
> +	 * make sure that the address range covered by this pgd is not
> +	 * unmapped from other threads.
> +	 */
> +	if (!pgd_huge(*pgd))
> +		goto out;
> +	if (pgd_present(*pgd)) {
> +		page = pgd_page(*pgd) + ((address & ~PGDIR_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +		if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> +			get_page(page);
> +	} else {
> +		if (is_hugetlb_entry_migration(huge_ptep_get((pte_t *)pgd))) {
> +			spin_unlock(ptl);
> +			__migration_entry_wait(mm, (pte_t *)pgd, ptl);
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * hwpoisoned entry is treated as no_page_table in
> +		 * follow_page_mask().
> +		 */
> +	}
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock(ptl);
> +	return page;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> 


Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07  5:37 [PATCH 00/10] Enable HugeTLB page migration on POWER Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm/mmap: Replace SHM_HUGE_MASK with MAP_HUGE_MASK inside mmap_pgoff Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  8:28   ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-13  7:54   ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm/hugetlb: Add PGD based implementation awareness Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  9:04   ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-11  5:25     ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-11  6:10       ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  9:16   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-18  8:44     ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  9:26   ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2016-04-11  5:39     ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-11 12:46       ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-07  9:34   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-11  6:04     ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-18  8:42       ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] powerpc/hugetlb: Add ABI defines for MAP_HUGE_16MB and MAP_HUGE_16GB Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 05/10] powerpc/hugetlb: Split the function 'huge_pte_alloc' Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-11 13:51   ` Balbir Singh
2016-04-13 11:08     ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 06/10] powerpc/hugetlb: Split the function 'huge_pte_offset' Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 07/10] powerpc/hugetlb: Prepare arch functions for ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 08/10] powerpc/hugetlb: Selectively enable ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] powerpc/hugetlb: Selectively enable ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-07  5:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] selfttest/powerpc: Add memory page migration tests Anshuman Khandual
2016-04-18  8:52 ` [PATCH 00/10] Enable HugeTLB page migration on POWER Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570627C9.5030105@gmail.com \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).