From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target()
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:18:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578DD44F.3040507@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160719065042.GC17479@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
On 2016/7/19 14:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:31:11PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> On 2016/7/18 16:05, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/18/2016 10:00 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>> On 2016/7/18 13:51, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:47:06AM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>>>> alloc_migrate_target() is called from migrate_pages(), and the page
>>>>>> is always from user space, so we can add __GFP_HIGHMEM directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, all migratable pages are not from user space. For example,
>>>>> blockdev file cache has __GFP_MOVABLE and migratable but it has no
>>>>> __GFP_HIGHMEM and __GFP_USER.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Joonsoo,
>>>>
>>>> So the original code "gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE;"
>>>> is not correct?
>>>
>>> It's not incorrect. GFP_USER just specifies some reclaim flags, and may perhaps restrict allocation through __GFP_HARDWALL, where the original
>>> page could have been allocated without the restriction. But it doesn't put the place in an unexpected address range, as placing a non-highmem page into highmem could. __GFP_MOVABLE then just controls a heuristic for placement within a zone.
>>>
>>>>> And, zram's memory isn't GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE but has __GFP_MOVABLE.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can we distinguish __GFP_MOVABLE or GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE when doing
>>>> mem-hotplug?
>>>
>>> I don't understand the question here, can you rephrase with more detail? Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> Above is answered by Vlastimil. :)
>
>> When we do memory offline, and the zone is movable zone,
>> can we use "alloc_pages_node(nid, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, 0);" to alloc a
>> new page? the nid is the next node.
>
> I don't know much about memory offline, but, AFAIK, memory offline
> could happen on non-movable zone like as ZONE_NORMAL. Perhaps, you can add
> "if zone of the page is movable zone then alloc with GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE".
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Joonsoo and Vlastimil,
Memory offline could happen on both movable zone and non-movable zone, and we
can offline the whole node if the zone is movable_zone(the node only has one
movable_zone), and if the zone is normal_zone, we cannot offline the whole node,
because some kernel memory can't be migrated.
So how about change alloc_migrate_target() to alloc memory from the next node
with GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, if the offline zone is movable_zone.
And if the offline zone is normal_zone, we don't change anything, that means
the new page may be from the same node.
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-19 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 2:47 [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu
2016-07-15 2:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] mem-hotplug: use different mempolicy in alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu
2016-07-18 8:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18 5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-18 7:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18 8:00 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-07-18 8:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-18 8:31 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-07-19 6:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-19 7:18 ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2016-07-19 19:05 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578DD44F.3040507@huawei.com \
--to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).