From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"'Kirill A. Shutemov'" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp: reduce usage of huge zero page's atomic counter
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:17:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C52BEB.8020104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0342377a-26b8-16b9-5817-1964fac0e12d@intel.com>
On 08/30/2016 11:24 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 08/30/2016 12:44 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> > On 08/30/2016 09:09 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:09:15 +0800 Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>> Case used for test on Haswell EP:
>>>>>> >>>>> usemem -n 72 --readonly -j 0x200000 100G
>>>>>> >>>>> Which spawns 72 processes and each will mmap 100G anonymous space and
>>>>>> >>>>> then do read only access to that space sequentially with a step of 2MB.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> perf report for base commit:
>>>>>> >>>>> 54.03% usemem [kernel.kallsyms] [k] get_huge_zero_page
>>>>>> >>>>> perf report for this commit:
>>>>>> >>>>> 0.11% usemem [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mm_get_huge_zero_page
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Does this mean that overall usemem runtime halved?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Sorry for the confusion, the above line is extracted from perf report.
>>>> >>> It shows the percent of CPU cycles executed in a specific function.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The above two perf lines are used to show get_huge_zero_page doesn't
>>>> >>> consume that much CPU cycles after applying the patch.
>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Do we have any numbers for something which is more real-wordly?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Unfortunately, no real world numbers.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> We think the global atomic counter could be an issue for performance
>>>> >>> so I'm trying to solve the problem.
>>> >>
>>> >> So, umm, we don't actually know if the patch is useful to anyone?
>> >
>> > On a POWER system it improves the CPU consumption of the above mentioned
>> > function a little bit. Dont think its going to improve actual throughput
>> > of the workload substantially.
>> >
>> > 0.07% usemem [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mm_get_huge_zero_page
> I guess this is the base commit? But there shouldn't be the new
> mm_get_huge_zero_page symbol before this patch. A typo perhaps?
Yeah, sorry about that.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-30 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 6:31 [PATCH] thp: reduce usage of huge zero page's atomic counter Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 8:49 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-29 8:53 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 13:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-29 14:10 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-29 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 3:09 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30 3:39 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 4:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30 4:56 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 5:54 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30 6:47 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2016-08-30 5:51 ` Aaron Lu
2016-08-30 5:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-08-30 5:19 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-30 15:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-08-31 2:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57C52BEB.8020104@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).