linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"robert.liu@huawei.com" <robert.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mem-hotplug: shall we skip unmovable node when doing numa balance?
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:17:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5823E6AF.8040600@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161109115827.GD3614@techsingularity.net>

On 2016/11/9 19:58, Mel Gorman wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 12:43:17PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> On mem-hotplug system, there is a problem, please see the following case.
>>
>> memtester xxG, the memory will be alloced on a movable node. And after numa
>> balancing, the memory may be migrated to the other node, it may be a unmovable
>> node. This will reduce the free memory of the unmovable node, and may be oom
>> later.
>>
> 
> How would it OOM later? It's movable memmory that is moving via
> automatic NUMA balancing so at the very least it can be reclaimed. If
> the memory is mlocked or unable to migrate then it's irrelevant if
> automatic balancing put it there.
> 

Hi Mel,

memtester will mlock the memory, so we can not reclaim, then maybe oom, right?
So let the manager set some numa policies to prevent the above case, right?

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

>> My question is that shall we skip unmovable node when doing numa balance?
>> or just let the manager set some numa policies?
>>
> 
> If the unmovable node must be protected from automatic NUMA balancing
> then policies are the appropriate step to prevent the processes running
> on that node or from allocating memory on that node.
> 
> Either way, protecting unmovable nodes in the name of hotplug is pretty
> much guaranteed to be a performance black hole because at the very
> least, page table pages will always be remote accesses for processes
> running on the unmovable node.
> 
>> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> index 057964d..f0954ac 100644
>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> @@ -2334,6 +2334,13 @@ int mpol_misplaced(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long
>>  out:
>>  	mpol_cond_put(pol);
>>  
>> +	/* Skip unmovable nodes when do numa balancing */
>> +	if (movable_node_enabled && ret != -1) {
>> +		zone = NODE_DATA(ret)->node_zones + MAX_NR_ZONES - 1;
>> +		if (!populated_zone(zone))
>> +			ret = -1;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
> 
> Nak.
> 



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-10  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08  4:43 [RFC] mem-hotplug: shall we skip unmovable node when doing numa balance? Xishi Qiu
2016-11-09 11:58 ` Mel Gorman
2016-11-10  3:17   ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2016-11-10  9:07     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5823E6AF.8040600@huawei.com \
    --to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=robert.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).