From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Timofey Titovets <timofey.titovets@synesis.ru>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] KSM: allow dedup all tasks memory
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:27:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a9ef9a0c8ed688e1566fc7380915837@natalenko.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGqmi77Ok0usUt5gfyPMYx22FdgqntSrwiap7=DT81HZuvNm_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 13.11.2018 18:10, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> You mean try do something, like that right?
>
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> <get reference to task>
> task_lock(task);
> read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> last_pid = task_pid_nr(task);
> ksm_import_task_vma(task);
> task_unlock(task);
No, task_lock() uses spin_lock() under the bonnet, so this will be the
same.
Since the sole reason you have to lock/acquire/get a reference to
task_struct here is to prevent it from disappearing, I was thinking
about using get_task_struct(), which just increases atomic
task_struct.usage value (IOW, takes a reference). I *hope* this will be
enough to prevent task_struct from disappearing in the meantime.
Someone, correct me if I'm wrong.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<20181112231344.7161-1-timofey.titovets@synesis.ru>
2018-11-13 11:06 ` [PATCH V3] KSM: allow dedup all tasks memory Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-11-13 11:56 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 16:33 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-11-13 17:10 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 17:27 ` Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2018-11-13 17:44 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 18:20 Timofey Titovets
[not found] <<CAG48ez0ZprqUYGZFxcrY6U3Dnwt77q1NJXzzpsn1XNkRuXVppw@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-13 14:23 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-11-13 17:59 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 18:17 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 18:35 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 18:54 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 19:16 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 22:40 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 22:53 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 23:07 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 20:26 ` Jann Horn
2018-11-13 22:35 ` Pavel Tatashin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-12 23:13 Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 1:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-13 11:25 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 2:25 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 11:40 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 18:42 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-11-13 22:55 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 11:57 ` Jann Horn
2018-11-13 12:58 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-11-13 13:25 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a9ef9a0c8ed688e1566fc7380915837@natalenko.name \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=timofey.titovets@synesis.ru \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).