From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, lsf-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Large block for I/O
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:33:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c356222-fe9e-41b0-b7fe-218fbcde4573@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03ebbc5f-2ff5-4f3c-8c5b-544413c55257@suse.de>
On 12/20/23 07:03, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I would like to discuss
>
> Large blocks for I/O
>
> Since the presentation last year there has been quite some developments
> and improvements in some areas, but at the same time a lack of progress
> in other areas.
> In this presentation/discussion I would like to highlight the current
> state of affairs, existing pain points, and future directions of development.
> It might be an idea to co-locate it with the MM folks as we do have
> quite some overlap with page-cache improvements and hugepage handling.
Hi Hannes,
I'm interested in this topic. But I'm wondering whether the disadvantages of
large blocks will be covered? Some NAND storage vendors are less than
enthusiast about increasing the logical block size beyond 4 KiB because it
increases the size of many writes to the device and hence increases write
amplification.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7970ad75-ca6a-34b9-43ea-c6f67fe6eae6@iogearbox.net>
2023-12-20 10:01 ` LSF/MM/BPF: 2024: Call for Proposals Daniel Borkmann
2023-12-20 15:03 ` [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Large block for I/O Hannes Reinecke
2023-12-21 20:33 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2023-12-21 20:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-21 21:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-12-22 5:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-22 5:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-22 5:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-08 19:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-01-08 19:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-22 18:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-02-25 23:09 ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-26 15:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-07 1:59 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-07 5:31 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-07 7:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-12-22 8:23 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2023-12-22 12:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-12-22 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-22 15:10 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-22 16:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-25 8:55 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2023-12-25 8:12 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2024-02-23 16:41 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-01-17 13:37 ` LSF/MM/BPF: 2024: Call for Proposals [Reminder] Daniel Borkmann
2024-02-14 13:03 ` LSF/MM/BPF: 2024: Call for Proposals [Final Reminder] Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c356222-fe9e-41b0-b7fe-218fbcde4573@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).