* [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up
@ 2025-07-18 18:37 Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2025-07-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series replaces both [PATCH v3 0/2] __folio_split() clean up
and [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code.
Hi all,
This patchset refactors __folio_split() and __split_unmapped_folio() to:
1. make __split_unmapped_folio() reusable for splitting unmapped
folios. It avoids the need for a new boolean unmapped parameter to guard
mapping-related code when __split_unmapped_folio() is reused to split
unmapped folios.
2. improve code readability and prevent smatch/coverity checkers from
complaining about NULL mapping referencing.
An additional benefit for __split_unmapped_folio() refactoring is that
__split_unmapped_folio() could be called on after-split folios by
__folio_split(). It can enable new split methods. For example, at deferred
split time, unmapped subpages can scatter arbitrarily within a large folio,
neither uniform nor non-uniform split can maximize after-split folio orders
for mapped subpages. The hope is that by calling __split_unmapped_folio()
multiple times, a better split result can be achieved.
The patchset is based on mm-new with aforementioned two patchsets
reverted. It passes mm selftests.
Changelog
===
From V4[6]:
1. Use VM_WARN_ONCE_ON_FOLIO() without return -EINVAL.
From V3[4]:
1. Split up Patch 1 into incremental changes:
a. Patch 1 moves code out of __split_unmapped_folio();
b. Patch 2 removes after_split label in __split_unmapped_folio();
c. Patch 3 refactors __folio_split() to deduplicate code;
d. Patch 4 converts VM_BUGs to VM_WARMs;
2. Added "mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code"
patch[5] to this series.
3. Added remap_flags to make remap_page() call easier to read.
4. Updated Patch 1 commit log to include variable rename information.
5. Converted additional VM_BUGs in __folio_split().
6. Renamed next_folio to end_folio to avoid confusion.
7. Added a comment about start for loop with folio_next(folio) instead
of just folio plus skipping folio in the loop body.
8. Dropped swapcache folio split check code from __split_unmapped_folio(),
since the check is already done at the beginning of __folio_split().
From V2[3]:
1. Code format fixes
2. Restructured code to remove after_split goto label.
From V1[2]:
1. Fixed indentations.
2. Used folio_expected_ref_count() to calculate ref_count instead of
open coding.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/94D8C1A4-780C-4BEC-A336-7D3613B54845@nvidia.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250711030259.3574392-1-ziy@nvidia.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250711182355.3592618-1-ziy@nvidia.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250714171823.3626213-1-ziy@nvidia.com/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250716171112.3666150-1-ziy@nvidia.com/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250718023000.4044406-1-ziy@nvidia.com/
Zi Yan (6):
mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio()
mm/huge_memory: remove after_split label in __split_unmapped_folio().
mm/huge_memory: deduplicate code in __folio_split().
mm/huge_memory: convert VM_BUG* to VM_WARN* in __folio_split.
mm/huge_memory: get frozen folio refcount with
folio_expected_ref_count()
mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code.
mm/huge_memory.c | 311 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 159 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio()
2025-07-18 18:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-18 18:37 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/huge_memory: remove after_split label in __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2025-07-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
remap(), folio_ref_unfreeze(), lru_add_split_folio() are not relevant to
splitting unmapped folio operations. Move them out to __folio_split() so
that __split_unmapped_folio() only handles unmapped folio splits. This
makes __split_unmapped_folio() reusable.
Remove the swapcache folio split check code before __split_unmapped_folio()
call, since it is already checked at the beginning of __folio_split() in
uniform_split_supported() and non_uniform_split_supported().
Along with the code move, there are some variable renames:
1. release is renamed to new_folio,
2. origin_folio is now folio, since __folio_split() has folio pointing to
the original folio already.
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 270 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 133 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index ce130225a8e5..63eebca07628 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3385,10 +3385,6 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
* order - 1 to new_order).
* @split_at: in buddy allocator like split, the folio containing @split_at
* will be split until its order becomes @new_order.
- * @lock_at: the folio containing @lock_at is left locked for caller.
- * @list: the after split folios will be added to @list if it is not NULL,
- * otherwise to LRU lists.
- * @end: the end of the file @folio maps to. -1 if @folio is anonymous memory.
* @xas: xa_state pointing to folio->mapping->i_pages and locked by caller
* @mapping: @folio->mapping
* @uniform_split: if the split is uniform or not (buddy allocator like split)
@@ -3414,52 +3410,26 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
* @page, which is split in next for loop.
*
* After splitting, the caller's folio reference will be transferred to the
- * folio containing @page. The other folios may be freed if they are not mapped.
- *
- * In terms of locking, after splitting,
- * 1. uniform split leaves @page (or the folio contains it) locked;
- * 2. buddy allocator like (non-uniform) split leaves @folio locked.
- *
+ * folio containing @page. The caller needs to unlock and/or free after-split
+ * folios if necessary.
*
* For !uniform_split, when -ENOMEM is returned, the original folio might be
* split. The caller needs to check the input folio.
*/
static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
- struct page *split_at, struct page *lock_at,
- struct list_head *list, pgoff_t end,
- struct xa_state *xas, struct address_space *mapping,
- bool uniform_split)
+ struct page *split_at, struct xa_state *xas,
+ struct address_space *mapping, bool uniform_split)
{
- struct lruvec *lruvec;
- struct address_space *swap_cache = NULL;
- struct folio *origin_folio = folio;
- struct folio *next_folio = folio_next(folio);
- struct folio *new_folio;
- struct folio *next;
int order = folio_order(folio);
- int split_order;
int start_order = uniform_split ? new_order : order - 1;
- int nr_dropped = 0;
- int ret = 0;
bool stop_split = false;
-
- if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
- VM_BUG_ON(mapping);
-
- /* a swapcache folio can only be uniformly split to order-0 */
- if (!uniform_split || new_order != 0)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- swap_cache = swap_address_space(folio->swap);
- xa_lock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
- }
+ struct folio *next;
+ int split_order;
+ int ret = 0;
if (folio_test_anon(folio))
mod_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, -1);
- /* lock lru list/PageCompound, ref frozen by page_ref_freeze */
- lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock(folio);
-
folio_clear_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
/*
@@ -3469,9 +3439,9 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
for (split_order = start_order;
split_order >= new_order && !stop_split;
split_order--) {
- int old_order = folio_order(folio);
- struct folio *release;
struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
+ int old_order = folio_order(folio);
+ struct folio *new_folio;
/* order-1 anonymous folio is not supported */
if (folio_test_anon(folio) && split_order == 1)
@@ -3506,113 +3476,32 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
after_split:
/*
- * Iterate through after-split folios and perform related
- * operations. But in buddy allocator like split, the folio
+ * Iterate through after-split folios and update folio stats.
+ * But in buddy allocator like split, the folio
* containing the specified page is skipped until its order
* is new_order, since the folio will be worked on in next
* iteration.
*/
- for (release = folio; release != end_folio; release = next) {
- next = folio_next(release);
+ for (new_folio = folio; new_folio != end_folio; new_folio = next) {
+ next = folio_next(new_folio);
/*
- * for buddy allocator like split, the folio containing
- * page will be split next and should not be released,
- * until the folio's order is new_order or stop_split
- * is set to true by the above xas_split() failure.
+ * for buddy allocator like split, new_folio containing
+ * @split_at page could be split again, thus do not
+ * change stats yet. Wait until new_folio's order is
+ * @new_order or stop_split is set to true by the above
+ * xas_split() failure.
*/
- if (release == page_folio(split_at)) {
- folio = release;
+ if (new_folio == page_folio(split_at)) {
+ folio = new_folio;
if (split_order != new_order && !stop_split)
continue;
}
- if (folio_test_anon(release)) {
- mod_mthp_stat(folio_order(release),
- MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, 1);
- }
-
- /*
- * origin_folio should be kept frozon until page cache
- * entries are updated with all the other after-split
- * folios to prevent others seeing stale page cache
- * entries.
- */
- if (release == origin_folio)
- continue;
-
- folio_ref_unfreeze(release, 1 +
- ((mapping || swap_cache) ?
- folio_nr_pages(release) : 0));
-
- lru_add_split_folio(origin_folio, release, lruvec,
- list);
-
- /* Some pages can be beyond EOF: drop them from cache */
- if (release->index >= end) {
- if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
- nr_dropped += folio_nr_pages(release);
- else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(release))
- folio_account_cleaned(release,
- inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
- __filemap_remove_folio(release, NULL);
- folio_put_refs(release, folio_nr_pages(release));
- } else if (mapping) {
- __xa_store(&mapping->i_pages,
- release->index, release, 0);
- } else if (swap_cache) {
- __xa_store(&swap_cache->i_pages,
- swap_cache_index(release->swap),
- release, 0);
- }
+ if (folio_test_anon(new_folio))
+ mod_mthp_stat(folio_order(new_folio),
+ MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, 1);
}
}
- /*
- * Unfreeze origin_folio only after all page cache entries, which used
- * to point to it, have been updated with new folios. Otherwise,
- * a parallel folio_try_get() can grab origin_folio and its caller can
- * see stale page cache entries.
- */
- folio_ref_unfreeze(origin_folio, 1 +
- ((mapping || swap_cache) ? folio_nr_pages(origin_folio) : 0));
-
- unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
-
- if (swap_cache)
- xa_unlock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
- if (mapping)
- xa_unlock(&mapping->i_pages);
-
- /* Caller disabled irqs, so they are still disabled here */
- local_irq_enable();
-
- if (nr_dropped)
- shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_dropped);
-
- remap_page(origin_folio, 1 << order,
- folio_test_anon(origin_folio) ?
- RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE : 0);
-
- /*
- * At this point, folio should contain the specified page.
- * For uniform split, it is left for caller to unlock.
- * For buddy allocator like split, the first after-split folio is left
- * for caller to unlock.
- */
- for (new_folio = origin_folio; new_folio != next_folio; new_folio = next) {
- next = folio_next(new_folio);
- if (new_folio == page_folio(lock_at))
- continue;
-
- folio_unlock(new_folio);
- /*
- * Subpages may be freed if there wasn't any mapping
- * like if add_to_swap() is running on a lru page that
- * had its mapping zapped. And freeing these pages
- * requires taking the lru_lock so we do the put_page
- * of the tail pages after the split is complete.
- */
- free_folio_and_swap_cache(new_folio);
- }
return ret;
}
@@ -3686,6 +3575,11 @@ bool uniform_split_supported(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
* It is in charge of checking whether the split is supported or not and
* preparing @folio for __split_unmapped_folio().
*
+ * After splitting, the after-split folio containing @lock_at remains locked
+ * and others are unlocked:
+ * 1. for uniform split, @lock_at points to one of @folio's subpages;
+ * 2. for buddy allocator like (non-uniform) split, @lock_at points to @folio.
+ *
* return: 0: successful, <0 failed (if -ENOMEM is returned, @folio might be
* split but not to @new_order, the caller needs to check)
*/
@@ -3695,10 +3589,12 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
{
struct deferred_split *ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(folio);
XA_STATE(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index);
+ struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
bool is_anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
struct address_space *mapping = NULL;
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
int order = folio_order(folio);
+ struct folio *new_folio, *next;
int extra_pins, ret;
pgoff_t end;
bool is_hzp;
@@ -3829,6 +3725,10 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
/* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
spin_lock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + extra_pins)) {
+ struct address_space *swap_cache = NULL;
+ int nr_dropped = 0;
+ struct lruvec *lruvec;
+
if (folio_order(folio) > 1 &&
!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
@@ -3862,9 +3762,105 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
}
}
- ret = __split_unmapped_folio(folio, new_order,
- split_at, lock_at, list, end, &xas, mapping,
- uniform_split);
+ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
+ VM_BUG_ON(mapping);
+
+ swap_cache = swap_address_space(folio->swap);
+ xa_lock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
+ }
+
+ /* lock lru list/PageCompound, ref frozen by page_ref_freeze */
+ lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock(folio);
+
+ ret = __split_unmapped_folio(folio, new_order, split_at, &xas,
+ mapping, uniform_split);
+
+ /*
+ * Unfreeze after-split folios and put them back to the right
+ * list. @folio should be kept frozon until page cache
+ * entries are updated with all the other after-split folios
+ * to prevent others seeing stale page cache entries.
+ * As a result, new_folio starts from the next folio of
+ * @folio.
+ */
+ for (new_folio = folio_next(folio); new_folio != end_folio;
+ new_folio = next) {
+ next = folio_next(new_folio);
+
+ folio_ref_unfreeze(
+ new_folio,
+ 1 + ((mapping || swap_cache) ?
+ folio_nr_pages(new_folio) :
+ 0));
+
+ lru_add_split_folio(folio, new_folio, lruvec, list);
+
+ /* Some pages can be beyond EOF: drop them from cache */
+ if (new_folio->index >= end) {
+ if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
+ nr_dropped += folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
+ else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(new_folio))
+ folio_account_cleaned(
+ new_folio,
+ inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
+ __filemap_remove_folio(new_folio, NULL);
+ folio_put_refs(new_folio,
+ folio_nr_pages(new_folio));
+ } else if (mapping) {
+ __xa_store(&mapping->i_pages, new_folio->index,
+ new_folio, 0);
+ } else if (swap_cache) {
+ __xa_store(&swap_cache->i_pages,
+ swap_cache_index(new_folio->swap),
+ new_folio, 0);
+ }
+ }
+ /*
+ * Unfreeze @folio only after all page cache entries, which
+ * used to point to it, have been updated with new folios.
+ * Otherwise, a parallel folio_try_get() can grab @folio
+ * and its caller can see stale page cache entries.
+ */
+ folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, 1 +
+ ((mapping || swap_cache) ? folio_nr_pages(folio) : 0));
+
+ unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
+
+ if (swap_cache)
+ xa_unlock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
+ if (mapping)
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+
+ local_irq_enable();
+
+ if (nr_dropped)
+ shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_dropped);
+
+ remap_page(folio, 1 << order,
+ !ret && folio_test_anon(folio) ?
+ RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE :
+ 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Unlock all after-split folios except the one containing
+ * @lock_at page. If @folio is not split, it will be kept locked.
+ */
+ for (new_folio = folio; new_folio != end_folio;
+ new_folio = next) {
+ next = folio_next(new_folio);
+ if (new_folio == page_folio(lock_at))
+ continue;
+
+ folio_unlock(new_folio);
+ /*
+ * Subpages may be freed if there wasn't any mapping
+ * like if add_to_swap() is running on a lru page that
+ * had its mapping zapped. And freeing these pages
+ * requires taking the lru_lock so we do the put_page
+ * of the tail pages after the split is complete.
+ */
+ free_folio_and_swap_cache(new_folio);
+ }
} else {
spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
fail:
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/huge_memory: remove after_split label in __split_unmapped_folio().
2025-07-18 18:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-18 18:37 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/huge_memory: deduplicate code in __folio_split() Zi Yan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2025-07-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
Checking stop_split instead to avoid the goto statement.
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 63eebca07628..e01359008b13 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3463,18 +3463,18 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
if (xas_error(xas)) {
ret = xas_error(xas);
stop_split = true;
- goto after_split;
}
}
}
- folio_split_memcg_refs(folio, old_order, split_order);
- split_page_owner(&folio->page, old_order, split_order);
- pgalloc_tag_split(folio, old_order, split_order);
+ if (!stop_split) {
+ folio_split_memcg_refs(folio, old_order, split_order);
+ split_page_owner(&folio->page, old_order, split_order);
+ pgalloc_tag_split(folio, old_order, split_order);
- __split_folio_to_order(folio, old_order, split_order);
+ __split_folio_to_order(folio, old_order, split_order);
+ }
-after_split:
/*
* Iterate through after-split folios and update folio stats.
* But in buddy allocator like split, the folio
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/huge_memory: deduplicate code in __folio_split().
2025-07-18 18:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/huge_memory: remove after_split label in __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-18 18:37 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 19:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/huge_memory: convert VM_BUG* to VM_WARN* in __folio_split Zi Yan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2025-07-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
xas unlock, remap_page(), local_irq_enable() are moved out of if branches
to deduplicate the code. While at it, add remap_flags to clean up
remap_page() call site. nr_dropped is renamed to nr_shmem_dropped, as it
becomes a variable at __folio_split() scope.
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index e01359008b13..d36f7bdaeb38 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3595,6 +3595,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
int order = folio_order(folio);
struct folio *new_folio, *next;
+ int nr_shmem_dropped = 0;
+ int remap_flags = 0;
int extra_pins, ret;
pgoff_t end;
bool is_hzp;
@@ -3718,15 +3720,16 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
*/
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_reset(&xas);
- if (xas_load(&xas) != folio)
+ if (xas_load(&xas) != folio) {
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
goto fail;
+ }
}
/* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
spin_lock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + extra_pins)) {
struct address_space *swap_cache = NULL;
- int nr_dropped = 0;
struct lruvec *lruvec;
if (folio_order(folio) > 1 &&
@@ -3798,7 +3801,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
/* Some pages can be beyond EOF: drop them from cache */
if (new_folio->index >= end) {
if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
- nr_dropped += folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
+ nr_shmem_dropped += folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(new_folio))
folio_account_cleaned(
new_folio,
@@ -3828,47 +3831,41 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
if (swap_cache)
xa_unlock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
- if (mapping)
- xas_unlock(&xas);
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ }
+fail:
+ if (mapping)
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+
+ local_irq_enable();
- local_irq_enable();
+ if (nr_shmem_dropped)
+ shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_shmem_dropped);
- if (nr_dropped)
- shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_dropped);
+ if (!ret && is_anon)
+ remap_flags = RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE;
+ remap_page(folio, 1 << order, remap_flags);
- remap_page(folio, 1 << order,
- !ret && folio_test_anon(folio) ?
- RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE :
- 0);
+ /*
+ * Unlock all after-split folios except the one containing
+ * @lock_at page. If @folio is not split, it will be kept locked.
+ */
+ for (new_folio = folio; new_folio != end_folio; new_folio = next) {
+ next = folio_next(new_folio);
+ if (new_folio == page_folio(lock_at))
+ continue;
+ folio_unlock(new_folio);
/*
- * Unlock all after-split folios except the one containing
- * @lock_at page. If @folio is not split, it will be kept locked.
+ * Subpages may be freed if there wasn't any mapping
+ * like if add_to_swap() is running on a lru page that
+ * had its mapping zapped. And freeing these pages
+ * requires taking the lru_lock so we do the put_page
+ * of the tail pages after the split is complete.
*/
- for (new_folio = folio; new_folio != end_folio;
- new_folio = next) {
- next = folio_next(new_folio);
- if (new_folio == page_folio(lock_at))
- continue;
-
- folio_unlock(new_folio);
- /*
- * Subpages may be freed if there wasn't any mapping
- * like if add_to_swap() is running on a lru page that
- * had its mapping zapped. And freeing these pages
- * requires taking the lru_lock so we do the put_page
- * of the tail pages after the split is complete.
- */
- free_folio_and_swap_cache(new_folio);
- }
- } else {
- spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
-fail:
- if (mapping)
- xas_unlock(&xas);
- local_irq_enable();
- remap_page(folio, folio_nr_pages(folio), 0);
- ret = -EAGAIN;
+ free_folio_and_swap_cache(new_folio);
}
out_unlock:
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/huge_memory: convert VM_BUG* to VM_WARN* in __folio_split.
2025-07-18 18:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up Zi Yan
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/huge_memory: deduplicate code in __folio_split() Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-18 18:37 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-22 15:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/huge_memory: get frozen folio refcount with folio_expected_ref_count() Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code Zi Yan
5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2025-07-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
These VM_BUG* can be handled gracefully without crashing kernel.
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index d36f7bdaeb38..d98283164eda 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3601,8 +3601,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
pgoff_t end;
bool is_hzp;
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
if (folio != page_folio(split_at) || folio != page_folio(lock_at))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -3766,7 +3766,11 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
}
if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
- VM_BUG_ON(mapping);
+ if (mapping) {
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(mapping, folio);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail;
+ }
swap_cache = swap_address_space(folio->swap);
xa_lock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/huge_memory: get frozen folio refcount with folio_expected_ref_count()
2025-07-18 18:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up Zi Yan
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/huge_memory: convert VM_BUG* to VM_WARN* in __folio_split Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-18 18:37 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code Zi Yan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2025-07-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
Instead of open coding the refcount calculation, use
folio_expected_ref_count() to calculate frozen folio refcount.
Because:
1. __folio_split() does not split a folio with PG_private, so no elevated
refcount from PG_private;
2. a frozen folio in __folio_split() is fully unmapped, so folio_mapcount()
in folio_expected_ref_count() is always 0;
3. (mapping || swap_cache) ? folio_nr_pages(folio) is taken care of by
folio_expected_ref_count() too.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index d98283164eda..19e69704fcff 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3731,6 +3731,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + extra_pins)) {
struct address_space *swap_cache = NULL;
struct lruvec *lruvec;
+ int expected_refs;
if (folio_order(folio) > 1 &&
!list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
@@ -3794,11 +3795,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
new_folio = next) {
next = folio_next(new_folio);
- folio_ref_unfreeze(
- new_folio,
- 1 + ((mapping || swap_cache) ?
- folio_nr_pages(new_folio) :
- 0));
+ expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(new_folio) + 1;
+ folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, expected_refs);
lru_add_split_folio(folio, new_folio, lruvec, list);
@@ -3828,8 +3826,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
* Otherwise, a parallel folio_try_get() can grab @folio
* and its caller can see stale page cache entries.
*/
- folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, 1 +
- ((mapping || swap_cache) ? folio_nr_pages(folio) : 0));
+ expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1;
+ folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_refs);
unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 6/6] mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code.
2025-07-18 18:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up Zi Yan
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/huge_memory: get frozen folio refcount with folio_expected_ref_count() Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-18 18:37 ` Zi Yan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2025-07-18 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Zi Yan, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
Smatch/coverity checkers report NULL mapping referencing issues[1][2][3]
every time the code is modified, because they do not understand that
mapping cannot be NULL when a folio is in page cache in the code.
Refactor the code to make it explicit.
Remove "end = -1" for anonymous folios, since after code refactoring, end
is no longer used by anonymous folio handling code.
No functional change is intended.
[1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/2afe3d59-aca5-40f7-82a3-a6d976fb0f4f@stanley.mountain/
[2]https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild/64b54034-f311-4e7d-b935-c16775dbb642@suswa.mountain/
[3]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250716145804.4836-1-antonio@mandelbit.com/
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 19e69704fcff..9c38a95e9f09 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3640,7 +3640,6 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out;
}
- end = -1;
mapping = NULL;
anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma);
} else {
@@ -3793,6 +3792,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
*/
for (new_folio = folio_next(folio); new_folio != end_folio;
new_folio = next) {
+ unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
+
next = folio_next(new_folio);
expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(new_folio) + 1;
@@ -3800,25 +3801,36 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
lru_add_split_folio(folio, new_folio, lruvec, list);
- /* Some pages can be beyond EOF: drop them from cache */
- if (new_folio->index >= end) {
- if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
- nr_shmem_dropped += folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
- else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(new_folio))
- folio_account_cleaned(
- new_folio,
- inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
- __filemap_remove_folio(new_folio, NULL);
- folio_put_refs(new_folio,
- folio_nr_pages(new_folio));
- } else if (mapping) {
- __xa_store(&mapping->i_pages, new_folio->index,
- new_folio, 0);
- } else if (swap_cache) {
+ /*
+ * Anonymous folio with swap cache.
+ * NOTE: shmem in swap cache is not supported yet.
+ */
+ if (swap_cache) {
__xa_store(&swap_cache->i_pages,
swap_cache_index(new_folio->swap),
new_folio, 0);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Anonymous folio without swap cache */
+ if (!mapping)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Add the new folio to the page cache. */
+ if (new_folio->index < end) {
+ __xa_store(&mapping->i_pages, new_folio->index,
+ new_folio, 0);
+ continue;
}
+
+ /* Drop folio beyond EOF: ->index >= end */
+ if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
+ nr_shmem_dropped += nr_pages;
+ else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(new_folio))
+ folio_account_cleaned(
+ new_folio, inode_to_wb(mapping->host));
+ __filemap_remove_folio(new_folio, NULL);
+ folio_put_refs(new_folio, nr_pages);
}
/*
* Unfreeze @folio only after all page cache entries, which
--
2.47.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/huge_memory: deduplicate code in __folio_split().
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/huge_memory: deduplicate code in __folio_split() Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-18 19:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes @ 2025-07-18 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zi Yan
Cc: David Hildenbrand, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter,
Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins, Kirill Shutemov, Baolin Wang,
Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache, Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song,
Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 02:37:17PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> xas unlock, remap_page(), local_irq_enable() are moved out of if branches
> to deduplicate the code. While at it, add remap_flags to clean up
> remap_page() call site. nr_dropped is renamed to nr_shmem_dropped, as it
> becomes a variable at __folio_split() scope.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Sorry I thought I'd reviewed this.
Have looked through carefully and the logic looks correct to me, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index e01359008b13..d36f7bdaeb38 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3595,6 +3595,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
> int order = folio_order(folio);
> struct folio *new_folio, *next;
> + int nr_shmem_dropped = 0;
> + int remap_flags = 0;
> int extra_pins, ret;
> pgoff_t end;
> bool is_hzp;
> @@ -3718,15 +3720,16 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> */
> xas_lock(&xas);
> xas_reset(&xas);
> - if (xas_load(&xas) != folio)
> + if (xas_load(&xas) != folio) {
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> goto fail;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
> spin_lock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + extra_pins)) {
> struct address_space *swap_cache = NULL;
> - int nr_dropped = 0;
> struct lruvec *lruvec;
>
> if (folio_order(folio) > 1 &&
> @@ -3798,7 +3801,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> /* Some pages can be beyond EOF: drop them from cache */
> if (new_folio->index >= end) {
> if (shmem_mapping(mapping))
> - nr_dropped += folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
> + nr_shmem_dropped += folio_nr_pages(new_folio);
> else if (folio_test_clear_dirty(new_folio))
> folio_account_cleaned(
> new_folio,
> @@ -3828,47 +3831,41 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>
> if (swap_cache)
> xa_unlock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
> - if (mapping)
> - xas_unlock(&xas);
> + } else {
> + spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +fail:
> + if (mapping)
> + xas_unlock(&xas);
> +
> + local_irq_enable();
>
> - local_irq_enable();
> + if (nr_shmem_dropped)
> + shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_shmem_dropped);
>
> - if (nr_dropped)
> - shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_dropped);
> + if (!ret && is_anon)
> + remap_flags = RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE;
> + remap_page(folio, 1 << order, remap_flags);
>
> - remap_page(folio, 1 << order,
> - !ret && folio_test_anon(folio) ?
> - RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE :
> - 0);
> + /*
> + * Unlock all after-split folios except the one containing
> + * @lock_at page. If @folio is not split, it will be kept locked.
> + */
> + for (new_folio = folio; new_folio != end_folio; new_folio = next) {
> + next = folio_next(new_folio);
> + if (new_folio == page_folio(lock_at))
> + continue;
>
> + folio_unlock(new_folio);
> /*
> - * Unlock all after-split folios except the one containing
> - * @lock_at page. If @folio is not split, it will be kept locked.
> + * Subpages may be freed if there wasn't any mapping
> + * like if add_to_swap() is running on a lru page that
> + * had its mapping zapped. And freeing these pages
> + * requires taking the lru_lock so we do the put_page
> + * of the tail pages after the split is complete.
> */
> - for (new_folio = folio; new_folio != end_folio;
> - new_folio = next) {
> - next = folio_next(new_folio);
> - if (new_folio == page_folio(lock_at))
> - continue;
> -
> - folio_unlock(new_folio);
> - /*
> - * Subpages may be freed if there wasn't any mapping
> - * like if add_to_swap() is running on a lru page that
> - * had its mapping zapped. And freeing these pages
> - * requires taking the lru_lock so we do the put_page
> - * of the tail pages after the split is complete.
> - */
> - free_folio_and_swap_cache(new_folio);
> - }
> - } else {
> - spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> -fail:
> - if (mapping)
> - xas_unlock(&xas);
> - local_irq_enable();
> - remap_page(folio, folio_nr_pages(folio), 0);
> - ret = -EAGAIN;
> + free_folio_and_swap_cache(new_folio);
> }
>
> out_unlock:
> --
> 2.47.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/huge_memory: convert VM_BUG* to VM_WARN* in __folio_split.
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/huge_memory: convert VM_BUG* to VM_WARN* in __folio_split Zi Yan
@ 2025-07-22 15:34 ` David Hildenbrand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-07-22 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zi Yan, Lorenzo Stoakes, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Dan Carpenter, Antonio Quartulli, Hugh Dickins,
Kirill Shutemov, Baolin Wang, Liam R. Howlett, Nico Pache,
Ryan Roberts, Dev Jain, Barry Song, Balbir Singh, Matthew Brost,
linux-kernel
On 18.07.25 20:37, Zi Yan wrote:
> These VM_BUG* can be handled gracefully without crashing kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index d36f7bdaeb38..d98283164eda 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3601,8 +3601,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> pgoff_t end;
> bool is_hzp;
>
> - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
>
> if (folio != page_folio(split_at) || folio != page_folio(lock_at))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -3766,7 +3766,11 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
> }
>
> if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
> - VM_BUG_ON(mapping);
> + if (mapping) {
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(mapping, folio);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto fail;
> + }
>
> swap_cache = swap_address_space(folio->swap);
> xa_lock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-22 15:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-18 18:37 [PATCH v5 0/6] __folio_split() clean up Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/huge_memory: remove after_split label in __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/huge_memory: deduplicate code in __folio_split() Zi Yan
2025-07-18 19:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/huge_memory: convert VM_BUG* to VM_WARN* in __folio_split Zi Yan
2025-07-22 15:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/huge_memory: get frozen folio refcount with folio_expected_ref_count() Zi Yan
2025-07-18 18:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code Zi Yan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).