linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: roman.gushchin@linux.dev,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,ast@kernel.org,surenb@google.com,mhocko@kernel.org,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,hannes@cmpxchg.org,andrii@kernel.org,inwardvessel@gmail.com,linux-mm@kvack.org,cgroups@vger.kernel.org,bpf@vger.kernel.org,martin.lau@kernel.org,song@kernel.org,memxor@gmail.com,tj@kernel.org,roman.gushchin@linux.dev,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,clm@meta.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/23] mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:48:32 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <634e7371353c8466b3d0fa0dd7ceeaf17c8c4d7b274f4f7369d3094d22872cd6@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027232206.473085-4-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2807 bytes --]


```
commit 5cd8d912032d2c2105c04660338cf4ad47d24697
Author: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>

mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers

This patch adds a new OOM constraint type CONSTRAINT_BPF and allows
BPF programs to specify a custom constraint name when calling
bpf_out_of_memory().

> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> index 3cbdcd013..704fc0e78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ enum oom_constraint {
>  	CONSTRAINT_CPUSET,
>  	CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY,
>  	CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,
> +	CONSTRAINT_BPF,
>  };
>
>  enum bpf_oom_flags {

[ ... ]

> @@ -63,6 +64,9 @@ struct oom_control {
>
>  	/* Policy name */
>  	const char *bpf_policy_name;
> +
> +	/* BPF-specific constraint name */
> +	const char *bpf_constraint;
>  #endif
>  };

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index d7fca4bf5..72a346261 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -267,6 +281,9 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct oom_control *oc)
>  	bool cpuset_limited = false;
>  	int nid;
>
> +	if (oc->constraint == CONSTRAINT_BPF)
> +		return CONSTRAINT_BPF;
> +
>  	if (is_memcg_oom(oc)) {
>  		oc->totalpages = mem_cgroup_get_max(oc->memcg) ?: 1;
>  		return CONSTRAINT_MEMCG;

[ ... ]

> @@ -1350,11 +1367,14 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc,
>   * Returns a negative value if an error occurred.
>   */
>  __bpf_kfunc int bpf_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg__nullable,
> -				  int order, u64 flags)
> +				  int order, u64 flags,
> +				  const char *constraint_text__nullable)
>  {
>  	struct oom_control oc = {
>  		.memcg = memcg__nullable,
>  		.order = order,
> +		.constraint = CONSTRAINT_BPF,
> +		.bpf_constraint = constraint_text__nullable,
>  	};
>  	int ret;

When CONSTRAINT_BPF is set in bpf_out_of_memory(), the early return in
constrained_alloc() prevents oc->totalpages from being initialized.  This
leaves totalpages at zero (from the designated initializer).

Later in the call chain out_of_memory()->select_bad_process()->
oom_evaluate_task()->oom_badness(), the code performs division by
totalpages at line 237:

    adj *= totalpages / 1000;

Can this cause a division by zero?  The path is reachable when a BPF
program calls bpf_out_of_memory() and either no BPF OOM handler is
registered or the handler fails to free memory, causing execution to fall
through to select_bad_process().


```

---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

In-Reply-To-Subject: `mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers`
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/18859027430

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-27 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27 23:21 [PATCH v2 11/23] mm: introduce BPF kfunc to access memory events Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] bpf: selftests: selftests for memcg stat kfuncs Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] mm: introduce bpf_out_of_memory() BPF kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:57   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 16:43     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-10  9:46   ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:13     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-12  7:50       ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2025-10-28 15:58     ` Chris Mason
2025-10-28 16:20       ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 16:35         ` Chris Mason
2025-11-10  9:31   ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:17     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-12  7:52       ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] mm: introduce bpf_task_is_oom_victim() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:32   ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 18:09     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 18:31       ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] libbpf: introduce bpf_map__attach_struct_ops_opts() Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:07     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:24       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] bpf: selftests: introduce read_cgroup_file() helper Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 16:31     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] bpf: selftests: BPF OOM handler test Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] sched: psi: refactor psi_trigger_create() Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi struct ops Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:40   ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 18:29     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 18:35       ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 19:54         ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi_create_trigger() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] bpf: selftests: add config for psi Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] bpf: selftests: PSI struct ops test Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:13     ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:30       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-10  9:48   ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:03     ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=634e7371353c8466b3d0fa0dd7ceeaf17c8c4d7b274f4f7369d3094d22872cd6@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).