From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: roman.gushchin@linux.dev,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,ast@kernel.org,surenb@google.com,mhocko@kernel.org,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,hannes@cmpxchg.org,andrii@kernel.org,inwardvessel@gmail.com,linux-mm@kvack.org,cgroups@vger.kernel.org,bpf@vger.kernel.org,martin.lau@kernel.org,song@kernel.org,memxor@gmail.com,tj@kernel.org,roman.gushchin@linux.dev,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,clm@meta.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/23] mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:48:32 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <634e7371353c8466b3d0fa0dd7ceeaf17c8c4d7b274f4f7369d3094d22872cd6@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027232206.473085-4-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2807 bytes --]
```
commit 5cd8d912032d2c2105c04660338cf4ad47d24697
Author: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers
This patch adds a new OOM constraint type CONSTRAINT_BPF and allows
BPF programs to specify a custom constraint name when calling
bpf_out_of_memory().
> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> index 3cbdcd013..704fc0e78 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ enum oom_constraint {
> CONSTRAINT_CPUSET,
> CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY,
> CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,
> + CONSTRAINT_BPF,
> };
>
> enum bpf_oom_flags {
[ ... ]
> @@ -63,6 +64,9 @@ struct oom_control {
>
> /* Policy name */
> const char *bpf_policy_name;
> +
> + /* BPF-specific constraint name */
> + const char *bpf_constraint;
> #endif
> };
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index d7fca4bf5..72a346261 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -267,6 +281,9 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct oom_control *oc)
> bool cpuset_limited = false;
> int nid;
>
> + if (oc->constraint == CONSTRAINT_BPF)
> + return CONSTRAINT_BPF;
> +
> if (is_memcg_oom(oc)) {
> oc->totalpages = mem_cgroup_get_max(oc->memcg) ?: 1;
> return CONSTRAINT_MEMCG;
[ ... ]
> @@ -1350,11 +1367,14 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc,
> * Returns a negative value if an error occurred.
> */
> __bpf_kfunc int bpf_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg__nullable,
> - int order, u64 flags)
> + int order, u64 flags,
> + const char *constraint_text__nullable)
> {
> struct oom_control oc = {
> .memcg = memcg__nullable,
> .order = order,
> + .constraint = CONSTRAINT_BPF,
> + .bpf_constraint = constraint_text__nullable,
> };
> int ret;
When CONSTRAINT_BPF is set in bpf_out_of_memory(), the early return in
constrained_alloc() prevents oc->totalpages from being initialized. This
leaves totalpages at zero (from the designated initializer).
Later in the call chain out_of_memory()->select_bad_process()->
oom_evaluate_task()->oom_badness(), the code performs division by
totalpages at line 237:
adj *= totalpages / 1000;
Can this cause a division by zero? The path is reachable when a BPF
program calls bpf_out_of_memory() and either no BPF OOM handler is
registered or the handler fails to free memory, causing execution to fall
through to select_bad_process().
```
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
In-Reply-To-Subject: `mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers`
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/18859027430
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 23:21 [PATCH v2 11/23] mm: introduce BPF kfunc to access memory events Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] bpf: selftests: selftests for memcg stat kfuncs Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] mm: introduce bpf_out_of_memory() BPF kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:57 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 16:43 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-10 9:46 ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-12 7:50 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for BPF triggers Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2025-10-28 15:58 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-28 16:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 16:35 ` Chris Mason
2025-11-10 9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:17 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-12 7:52 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] mm: introduce bpf_task_is_oom_victim() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 18:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 18:31 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-27 23:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] libbpf: introduce bpf_map__attach_struct_ops_opts() Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] bpf: selftests: introduce read_cgroup_file() helper Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 16:31 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] bpf: selftests: BPF OOM handler test Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] sched: psi: refactor psi_trigger_create() Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi struct ops Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:40 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 18:29 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-28 19:54 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi_create_trigger() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] bpf: selftests: add config for psi Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] bpf: selftests: PSI struct ops test Roman Gushchin
2025-10-27 23:48 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-28 17:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-28 17:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-10 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2025-11-11 19:03 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=634e7371353c8466b3d0fa0dd7ceeaf17c8c4d7b274f4f7369d3094d22872cd6@mail.kernel.org \
--to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).