From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Memory controller merge (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:10:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830710040910u3696df8p3c0448555cac23e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710021604260.4916@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
On 10/2/07, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:
>
> I accept that full swap control is something you're intending to add
> incrementally later; but the current state doesn't make sense to me.
One comment on swap - ideally it should be a separate subsystem from
the memory controller. That way people who are using cpusets to
provide memory isolation (rather than using the page-based memory
controller) can also get swap isolation.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-04 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071001142222.fcaa8d57.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-02 4:21 ` Memory controller merge (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24) Balbir Singh
2007-10-02 15:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-03 8:13 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-03 18:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-04 4:16 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-04 13:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-05 3:07 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-07 17:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-08 2:54 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-04 16:10 ` Paul Menage [this message]
2007-10-10 21:07 ` Rik van Riel
2007-10-11 6:33 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-02 16:06 ` kswapd min order, slub max order [was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24] Hugh Dickins
2007-10-02 9:10 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-02 18:38 ` Mel Gorman
2007-10-02 18:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-03 0:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-02 16:21 ` new aops merge " Hugh Dickins
2007-10-02 17:45 ` remove zero_page (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24) Nick Piggin
2007-10-03 10:58 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-03 15:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-08 15:17 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-09 13:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-09 14:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-09 9:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-10 2:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-09 10:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-10 3:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-10 4:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-10 5:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-09 14:30 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-10 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830710040910u3696df8p3c0448555cac23e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).