From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2157D6B0089 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:14:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from spaceape9.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape9.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.143]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n0M2Dv0h016043 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:13:58 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rvbf6.prod.google.com [10.140.82.6]) by spaceape9.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n0M2DPhv005919 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:13:53 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so4150957rvb.55 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:13:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090122110632.e5c4216c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090115192120.9956911b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090115192712.33b533c3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830901191739t45c793afk2ceda8fc430121ce@mail.gmail.com> <20090120110221.005e116c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830901191823q556faeeub28d02d39dda7396@mail.gmail.com> <20090120115832.0881506c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090120144337.82ed51d5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830901210136j9baf45ft4c86a93fec70827f@mail.gmail.com> <20090121193436.c314ad7d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090122110632.e5c4216c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:13:53 -0800 Message-ID: <6599ad830901211813v1256db8q36facac4f99f4837@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1.5/4] cgroup: delay populate css id From: Paul Menage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" List-ID: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:06 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > BTW, isn't it better to use rcu_assign_pointer to show "this pointer will be > dereferenced from RCU-read-side" ? > Yes, I think using rcu_assign_pointer() is fine here. Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org