From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Giorgi Tchankvetadze <giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/mm: Added fork inheritance test for ksm_merging_pages counter
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 20:15:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <659ba2d4-fee3-410d-b611-04a3586b5bb7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26e38fe5-e6c4-4678-8056-95c0ff4350e6@redhat.com>
On 9/17/25 6:45 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.09.25 17:03, Donet Tom wrote:
>> Added a new selftest to verify whether the `ksm_merging_pages` counter
>> in `mm_struct` is not inherited by a child process after fork. This
>> helps
>> ensure correctness of KSM accounting across process creation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
>> index 712f43c87736..645cefba2126 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
>> @@ -602,6 +602,45 @@ static void test_prot_none(void)
>> munmap(map, size);
>> }
>> +static void test_fork_ksm_merging_page_count(void)
>> +{
>> + const unsigned int size = 2 * MiB;
>> + char *map;
>> + pid_t child_pid;
>> + int status;
>> +
>> + ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__);
>> +
>> + map = mmap_and_merge_range(0xcf, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> KSM_MERGE_MADVISE);
>> + if (map == MAP_FAILED)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + child_pid = fork();
>> + if (!child_pid) {
>> + init_global_file_handles();
>> + exit(ksm_get_self_merging_pages());
>> + } else if (child_pid < 0) {
>> + ksft_test_result_fail("fork() failed\n");
>> + return;
>
> Probably
> goto out;
>
> in all these fail cases
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) < 0) {
>> + ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
>> + if (status) {
>> + ksft_test_result_fail("ksm_merging_page in child: %d\n",
>> status);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ksft_test_result_pass("ksm_merging_pages is not inherited after
>> fork\n");
>> +
>
> And have
>
> out:
>
> here
Sure, I will send a v3 with this change.
>
> With that:
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 15:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/ksm: Fix incorrect accounting of KSM counters during fork Donet Tom
2025-09-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/ksm: Fix incorrect KSM counter handling in mm_struct " Donet Tom
2025-09-15 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 2:14 ` Joe Perches
2025-09-16 2:54 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 4:33 ` Sasha Levin
2025-09-16 4:41 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-16 12:45 ` Sasha Levin
2025-09-16 5:50 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-17 10:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 12:27 ` Chengming Zhou
2025-09-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/mm: Added fork inheritance test for ksm_merging_pages counter Donet Tom
2025-09-17 13:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 14:45 ` Donet Tom [this message]
2025-09-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/mm: Added fork test to verify global ksm_zero_pages counter behavior Donet Tom
2025-09-17 13:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-17 14:47 ` Donet Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=659ba2d4-fee3-410d-b611-04a3586b5bb7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).