linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Shared page accounting for memory cgroup
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:19:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <661de9471001181749y2fe22a15j1c01c94aa1838e99@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100119102208.59a16397.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Daisuke Nishimura
<nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
[snip]
>> Correct, file cache is almost always considered shared, so it has
>>
>> 1. non-private or shared usage of 10MB
>> 2. 10 MB of file cache
>>
>> > I don't think "non private usage" is appropriate to this value.
>> > Why don't you just show "sum_of_each_process_rss" ? I think it would be easier
>> > to understand for users.
>>
>> Here is my concern
>>
>> 1. The gap between looking at memcg stat and sum of all RSS is way
>> higher in user space
>> 2. Summing up all rss without walking the tasks atomically can and
>> will lead to consistency issues. Data can be stale as long as it
>> represents a consistent snapshot of data
>>
>> We need to differentiate between
>>
>> 1. Data snapshot (taken at a time, but valid at that point)
>> 2. Data taken from different sources that does not form a uniform
>> snapshot, because the timestamping of the each of the collected data
>> items is different
>>
> Hmm, I'm sorry I can't understand why you need "difference".
> IOW, what can users or middlewares know by the value in the above case
> (0MB in 01 and 10MB in 02)? I've read this thread, but I can't understande about
> this point... Why can this value mean some of the groups are "heavy" ?
>

Consider a default cgroup that is not root and assume all applications
move there initially. Now with a lot of shared memory,
the default cgroup will be the first one to page in a lot of the
memory and its usage will be very high. Without the concept of
showing how much is non-private, how does one decide if the default
cgroup is using a lot of memory or sharing it? How
do we decide on limits of a cgroup without knowing its actual usage -
PSS equivalent for a region of memory for a task.

Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-19  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-29 18:27 [RFC] Shared page accounting for memory cgroup Balbir Singh
2010-01-03 23:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-04  0:07   ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-04  0:35     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-04  0:50       ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-06  4:02         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-06  7:01           ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-06  7:12             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-07  7:15               ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-07  7:36                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-07  8:34                   ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-07  8:48                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-07  9:08                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-07  9:27                         ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-07 23:47                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-17 19:30                             ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-18  0:05                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-18  0:22                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-18  0:49                               ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-01-18  8:26                                 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-19  1:22                                   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-01-19  1:49                                     ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2010-01-19  2:34                                       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-01-19  3:52                                         ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-20  4:09                                           ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-01-20  7:15                                             ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-01-20  7:43                                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-20  8:18                                               ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-20  8:17                                             ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-21  1:04                                               ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-01-21  1:30                                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=661de9471001181749y2fe22a15j1c01c94aa1838e99@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).