From: syzbot <syzbot+a6456f6334aa19425886@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ebpqwerty472123@gmail.com,
hughd@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] possible deadlock in upgrade_mmap_lock_carefully
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 18:32:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66fdf42e.050a0220.28a3b.01f3.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhSa-2Q5SPXJHfvyHCYXQEFPDQaYcRf82FVB2CH-PHxnFA@mail.gmail.com>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:14 AM Shu Han <ebpqwerty472123@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It seems to be the same as [1].
>> New LSM hook position for remap_file_pages + IMA = deadlock.
>> The new LSM hook position is added for a bypass caused by
>> no check in remap_file_pages + READ_IMPLIES_EXEC in do_mmap.
>
> Thanks Shu Han, let's mark this as a dup and sort out a fix in the first report.
>
> #syz dup: [syzbot] [integrity?] [lsm?] possible deadlock in
can't find the dup bug
> process_measurement (4)
>
>> I suggest fix it by removing the check and moving READ_IMPLIES_EXEC
>> out of do_mmap[2].
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240928065620.7abadb2d8552f03d785c77c9@linux-foundation.org/
>> [1]
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240928180044.50-1-ebpqwerty472123@gmail.com/
>> [2]
>
> --
> paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-28 22:34 [syzbot] [mm?] possible deadlock in upgrade_mmap_lock_carefully syzbot
2024-10-01 18:46 ` syzbot
2024-10-02 4:48 ` syzbot
2024-10-02 12:14 ` Shu Han
2024-10-03 1:32 ` Paul Moore
2024-10-03 1:32 ` syzbot [this message]
2024-10-03 2:52 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66fdf42e.050a0220.28a3b.01f3.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+a6456f6334aa19425886@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebpqwerty472123@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox