linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	Yushan Wang <wangyushan12@huawei.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] memregion: Support fine grained invalidate by cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion()
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:31:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <686eedb25ed02_24471002e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250624154805.66985-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> 
> Extend cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() to support invalidate certain
> range of memory. Control of types of invlidation is left for when

s/invlidation/invalidation/

> usecases turn up. For now everything is Clean and Invalidate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c    | 6 +++++-
>  drivers/nvdimm/region.c      | 3 ++-
>  drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c | 3 ++-
>  include/linux/memregion.h    | 8 ++++++--
>  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index 46edc11726b7..8b39aad22458 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ bool cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion, "DEVMEM");
>  
> -int cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion(int res_desc)
> +int cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion(int res_desc, phys_addr_t start, size_t len)
>  {
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_cache_has_invalidate_memregion()))
>  		return -ENXIO;
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 6e5e1460068d..6e6e8ace0897 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,11 @@ static int cxl_region_invalidate_memregion(struct cxl_region *cxlr)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  	}
>  
> -	cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion(IORES_DESC_CXL);
> +	if (!cxlr->params.res)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +	cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion(IORES_DESC_CXL,
> +				       cxlr->params.res->start,
> +				       resource_size(cxlr->params.res));

So lets abandon the never used @res_desc argument. It was originally
there for documentation and the idea that with HDM-DB CXL invalidation
could be triggered from the device. However, that never came to pass,
and the continued existence of the option is confusing especially if
the range may not be a strict subset of the res_desc.

Alternatively, keep the @res_desc parameter and have the backend lookup
the ranges to flush from the descriptor, but I like that option less.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-09 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-24 15:47 [PATCH v2 0/8] Cache coherency management subsystem Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] memregion: Support fine grained invalidate by cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion() Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-09 19:46   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-07-09 22:31   ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-07-11 11:54     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] generic: Support ARCH_HAS_CPU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_MEMREGION Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 16:16   ` Greg KH
2025-06-25 16:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-10  5:57   ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-10  6:01     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-07-11 11:53       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-11 11:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 16:07       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] cache: coherency core registration and instance handling Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] MAINTAINERS: Add Jonathan Cameron to drivers/cache Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: Select GENERIC_CPU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_MEMREGION Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-25 16:21   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-28  7:10   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] cache: Support cache maintenance for HiSilicon SoC Hydra Home Agent Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 17:18   ` Randy Dunlap
2025-06-24 15:48 ` [RFC v2 7/8] acpi: PoC of Cache control via ACPI0019 and _DSM Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] Hack: Pretend we have PSCI 1.2 Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-25  8:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Cache coherency management subsystem Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25  9:12   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-06-25  9:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25 17:03       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26  9:55         ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-10  5:32           ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-10 10:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-10 18:36               ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-10  5:22       ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-10  5:31         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-07-10 10:56         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-10 18:45           ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-10 18:55             ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-07-10 19:11               ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-10 19:16                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-07-09 19:53     ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=686eedb25ed02_24471002e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wangyushan12@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).