From: Julian Sun <sunjunchao@bytedance.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: Don't wait writeback completion when release memcg.
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:08:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d54e933-5ff4-4711-abb9-96d39a5dd62e@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lvycz43vcro2cwjun4tswjv67tz5sg4tans3hragwils3gvnbh@hxbjk6x6v5zk>
在 2025/8/25 18:13, Jan Kara 写道:
Hi, Jan
Thanks for your review and comments.
> On Thu 21-08-25 10:30:30, Julian Sun wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 4:58 AM Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 07:19:40PM +0800, Julian Sun wrote:
>>>> @@ -3912,8 +3921,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>>>> int __maybe_unused i;
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < MEMCG_CGWB_FRN_CNT; i++)
>>>> - wb_wait_for_completion(&memcg->cgwb_frn[i].done);
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < MEMCG_CGWB_FRN_CNT; i++) {
>>>> + struct wb_completion *done = memcg->cgwb_frn[i].done;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&done->cnt))
>>>> + kfree(done);
>>>> + }
>>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Can't you just remove done? I don't think it's doing anything after your
>>> changes anyway.
>>
>> Thanks for your review.
>>
>> AFAICT done is also used to track free slots in
>> mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty_slowpath() and
>> mem_cgroup_flush_foreign(), otherwise we have no method to know which
>> one is free and might flush more than what MEMCG_CGWB_FRN_CNT allow.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>
> True, but is that mechanism really needed? Given the approximate nature of
> foreign flushing, couldn't we just always replace the oldest foreign entry
> regardless of whether the writeback is running or not? I didn't give too
> deep thought to this but from a quick look this should work just fine...
AFAICT the mechanism is used to make the max number of wb works that we
issue concurrently less than MEMCG_CGWB_FRN_CNT(4). If we replace the
oldest and flush wb work whether the writeback is running or not, it
seems that we are likely to flush more than MEMCG_CGWB_FRN_CNT wb works
concurrently, I'm not sure how much influence this will have...
>
> Honza
Thanks,
--
Julian Sun <sunjunchao@bytedance.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 11:19 [PATCH 0/3] memcg, writeback: Don't wait writeback completion Julian Sun
2025-08-20 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] writeback: Rename wb_writeback_work->auto_free to free_work Julian Sun
2025-08-20 11:19 ` [PATCH] writeback: Add wb_writeback_work->free_done Julian Sun
2025-08-20 11:19 ` [PATCH] memcg: Don't wait writeback completion when release memcg Julian Sun
2025-08-20 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-21 2:30 ` [External] " Julian Sun
2025-08-21 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-21 18:00 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-21 18:16 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-21 19:01 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-22 8:22 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-22 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-23 6:18 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-23 8:08 ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze
2025-08-23 8:22 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-23 14:08 ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze
2025-08-23 15:17 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-25 17:45 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-25 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-25 19:06 ` Julian Sun
2025-08-25 10:13 ` Jan Kara
2025-08-25 12:08 ` Julian Sun [this message]
2025-08-25 18:57 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-20 12:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] memcg, writeback: Don't wait writeback completion Giorgi Tchankvetadze
2025-08-21 2:37 ` [External] " Julian Sun
2025-08-22 9:29 ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d54e933-5ff4-4711-abb9-96d39a5dd62e@bytedance.com \
--to=sunjunchao@bytedance.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).