Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] smb: prevent TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL from interrupting
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:18:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e9aa19ba351b8c7f4df2992342a75da@manguebit.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818-work-tif_notify_signal-v1-4-1ee1fcc5b3ff@kernel.org>

Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> writes:

> smb_send_kvec() blocks every signal during a send:
>
> 	sigfillset(&mask);
> 	sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &mask, &oldmask);
>
> An incomplete or partial sent would cause the connection to become out
> of sync. That in turn would cause the session to be torn down and
> reconnected.
>
> In 00be6f26a2a7 ("smb: client: transport: avoid reconnects triggered
> by pending task work") smb hand-rolled its own solution. Have it use the
> new no_notify_signal_save() critical section instead.
>
> This stops io_uring from cancelling a send in flight but that's just
> like it is today and it is bounded by sk_sndtimeo at around 15s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-18 10:29 [PATCH 0/4] Stop TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL from interrupting work that can't be restarted Christian Brauner
2026-08-18 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] signal: allow taks to temporarily block TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL Christian Brauner
2026-08-21 14:35   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-08-18 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] coredump: prevent TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL from interrupting coredumps Christian Brauner
2026-08-18 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/coredump: test that TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL doesn't truncate a coredump Christian Brauner
2026-08-18 10:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] smb: prevent TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL from interrupting Christian Brauner
2026-08-21 17:18   ` Paulo Alcantara [this message]
2026-08-19 12:50 ` [PATCH 0/4] Stop TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL from interrupting work that can't be restarted Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e9aa19ba351b8c7f4df2992342a75da@manguebit.org \
    --to=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox