linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Enable runtime update of memmap_on_memory parameter
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 21:27:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f66dfcc-3d2a-c47c-1b84-c0d5210564d6@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31305ab7-1e65-80aa-ee91-9190c8f67430@redhat.com>

On 8/2/23 9:24 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.08.23 17:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 02-08-23 10:15:04, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
>>> On 8/1/23 4:20 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> On Tue 01-08-23 14:58:29, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote:
>>>>> On 8/1/23 2:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue 01-08-23 10:11:16, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>>>>> Allow updating memmap_on_memory mode after the kernel boot. Memory
>>>>>>> hotplug done after the mode update will use the new mmemap_on_memory
>>>>>>> value.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, this is a user space kABI extension and as such you should spend
>>>>>> more words about the usecase. Why we could live with this static and now
>>>>>> need dynamic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This enables easy testing of memmap_on_memory feature without a kernel reboot.
>>>>
>>>> Testing alone is rather weak argument to be honest.
>>>>
>>>>> I also expect people wanting to use that when they find dax kmem memory online
>>>>> failing because of struct page allocation failures[1]. User could reboot back with
>>>>> memmap_on_memory=y kernel parameter. But being able to enable it via sysfs makes
>>>>> the feature much more useful.
>>>>
>>>> Sure it can be useful but that holds for any feature, right. The main
>>>> question is whether this is worth maintaing. The current implementation
>>>> seems rather trivial which is an argument to have it but are there any
>>>> risks long term? Have you evaluated a potential long term maintenance
>>>> cost? There is no easy way to go back and disable it later on without
>>>> breaking some userspace.
>>>>
>>>> All that should be in the changelog!
>>>
>>> I updated it as below.
>>>
>>> mm/memory_hotplug: Enable runtime update of memmap_on_memory parameter
>>>
>>> Allow updating memmap_on_memory mode after the kernel boot. Memory
>>> hotplug done after the mode update will use the new mmemap_on_memory
>>> value.
>>>
>>> It is now possible to test the memmap_on_memory feature easily without
>>> the need for a kernel reboot. Additionally, for those encountering
>>> struct page allocation failures while using dax kmem memory online, this
>>> feature may prove useful. Instead of rebooting with the
>>> memmap_on_memory=y kernel parameter, users can now enable it via sysfs,
>>> which greatly enhances its usefulness.
>>
>>
>> I do not really see a solid argument why rebooting is really a problem
>> TBH. Also is the global policy knob really the right fit for existing
>> hotplug usecases? In other words, if we really want to make
>> memmap_on_memory more flexible would it make more sense to have it per
>> memory block property instead (the global knob being the default if
>> admin doesn't specify it differently).
> 
> Per memory block isn't possible, due to the creation order. Also, I think it's not the right approach.
> 
> I thought about driver toggles. At least for dax/kmem people are looking into that:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230801-vv-kmem_memmap-v3-2-406e9aaf5689@intel.com
> 
> Where that can also be toggled per device.
> 

That still is dependent on the global memmap_on_memory enabled right? We could make the dax facility independent of the
global feature toggle? 

-aneesh


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-01  4:41 [PATCH v7 0/7] Add support for memmap on memory feature on ppc64 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-08-01  4:41 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Simplify ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE kconfig Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-08-01  4:41 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] powerpc/book3s64/memhotplug: Enable memmap on memory for radix Aneesh Kumar K.V
     [not found] ` <20230801044116.10674-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
2023-08-01  8:58   ` [PATCH v7 7/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Enable runtime update of memmap_on_memory parameter Michal Hocko
     [not found]     ` <a32fe748-fa18-bd92-3a10-5da8dbad96e6@linux.ibm.com>
2023-08-01 10:50       ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-02  4:45         ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2023-08-02 15:50           ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-02 15:54             ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 15:57               ` Aneesh Kumar K V [this message]
2023-08-02 16:02                 ` Verma, Vishal L
2023-08-02 16:59               ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-03  8:52                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-03  9:24                   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-03 11:30                     ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                       ` <d71a85b1-c0ea-6451-d65c-d7c5040caf77@linux.ibm.com>
2023-08-07 12:27                         ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-07 12:41                           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-07 18:35                             ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-08  6:09                               ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2023-08-08  6:29                               ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2023-08-08  7:46                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-07 12:54                       ` David Hildenbrand
     [not found] ` <20230801044116.10674-5-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
2023-08-01  9:04   ` [PATCH v7 4/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Support memmap_on_memory when memmap is not aligned to pageblocks Michal Hocko
2023-08-01  9:07 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] Add support for memmap on memory feature on ppc64 Michal Hocko
     [not found] ` <20230801044116.10674-7-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
2023-08-01 23:10   ` [PATCH v7 6/7] mm/memory_hotplug: Embed vmem_altmap details in memory block Verma, Vishal L
2023-08-02  4:47     ` Aneesh Kumar K V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f66dfcc-3d2a-c47c-1b84-c0d5210564d6@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).