linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: avoid corrupting page->mapping in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:32:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fecf875-260e-a9c5-df24-9b0d13970057@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHvVchMbJjOp4U+5K83YN0XHMRKfGzTLgCnzKd8mjYMQPRWaw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2022/7/16 1:51, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:39 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:07 AM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:45:37AM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
>>>>> I agree we should either:
>>>>> - Update the UFFD selftest to exercise this case
>>>>> - Or, don't allow it, update vma_can_userfault() to also require VM_SHARED
>>>>> for VM_UFFD_MINOR registration.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first one is unfortunately not completely straightforward as Peter
>>>>> described. I would say it's probably not worth holding up this fix while we
>>>>> wait for it to happen?
>>>>
>>>> Agreed, Andrew has already queued it.  It actually is a real fix since we
>>>> never forbid the user running private mappings upon minor faults, so
>>>> it's literally a bug in kernel irrelevant of the kselftest.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't really have a strong preference between the two. The second option
>>>>> is what I originally proposed in the first version of the minor fault
>>>>> series, so going back to that isn't a problem at least from my perspective.
>>>>> If in the future we find a real use case for this, we could always easily
>>>>> re-enable it and add selftests for it at that point.
>>>>
>>>> I'd go for fixing the test case if possible.  Mike, would it be fine if we
>>>> go back to /dev/hugepages path based approach in the test case?
>>>
>>> One possible alternative, can we use memfd_create() with MFD_HUGE_*?
>>> This afaict lets us have an fd so we can create two mappings,
>>> without having to mount hugetlbfs, pass in a path to the test, ...
>>
>> Sounds good. :) We can also rework the shared hugetlb too.  Wanna post a
>> patch?  I can do that too, let me know otherwise.  Thanks!
> 
> Sure, I'll take a whack at it.

Many thanks for all of your hard work. :)

> 
>>
>> --
>> Peter Xu
>>
> .
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-16  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-12 13:05 [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: avoid corrupting page->mapping in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte Miaohe Lin
2022-07-12 17:39 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-13  2:10   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-13 14:24   ` Peter Xu
2022-07-13 16:10     ` Peter Xu
2022-07-13 22:46       ` Axel Rasmussen
2022-07-13 23:36         ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-14  0:20           ` Axel Rasmussen
2022-07-14 10:09             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-14 15:45               ` Peter Xu
2022-07-15  2:50                 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-13 17:23 ` Andrew Morton
2022-07-14  9:59   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-14 15:52     ` Peter Xu
2022-07-15  3:56       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-15 12:35         ` Peter Xu
2022-07-15 16:45           ` Axel Rasmussen
2022-07-15 17:07             ` Peter Xu
2022-07-15 17:28               ` Axel Rasmussen
2022-07-15 17:39                 ` Peter Xu
2022-07-15 17:51                   ` Axel Rasmussen
2022-07-16  1:32                     ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-07-15 17:29               ` Mike Kravetz
2022-07-15 17:38                 ` Peter Xu
2022-07-16 23:06     ` Andrew Morton
2022-07-18  2:25       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-18 18:07         ` Axel Rasmussen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6fecf875-260e-a9c5-df24-9b0d13970057@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).