From: Daniel Jordan <lkmldmj@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: john terragon <terragonjohn@yahoo.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org"
<bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 200105] High paging activity as soon as the swap is touched (with steps and code to reproduce it)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:35:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71c2d8a5-c29e-9284-67ab-bde6d3f0122e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723130235.GF31229@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 7/23/18 9:02 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [I am really sorry to be slow on responding]
>
> On Sat 21-07-18 10:39:05, Daniel Jordan wrote:
>> John's issue only happens using a LUKS encrypted swap partition,
>> unencrypted swap or swap encrypted without LUKS works fine.
>>
>> In one test (out5.txt) where most system memory is taken by anon pages
>> beforehand, the heavy direct reclaim that Michal noticed lasts for 24
>> seconds, during which on average if I've crunched my numbers right,
>> John's test program was allocating at 4MiB/s, the system overall
>> (pgalloc_normal) was allocating at 235MiB/s, and the system was
>> swapping out (pswpout) at 673MiB/s. pgalloc_normal and pswpout stay
>> roughly the same each second, no big swings.
>>
>> Is the disparity between allocation and swapout rate expected?
>>
>> John ran perf during another test right before the last test program
>> was started (this doesn't include the initial large allocation
>> bringing the system close to swapping). The top five allocators
>> (kmem:mm_page_alloc):
>>
>> # Overhead Pid:Command
>> # ........ .......................
>> #
>> 48.45% 2005:memeater # the test program
>> 32.08% 73:kswapd0
>> 3.16% 1957:perf_4.17
>> 1.41% 1748:watch
>> 1.16% 2043:free
>
> Huh, kswapd allocating memory sounds really wrong here. Is it possible
> that the swap device driver is double buffering and allocating a new
> page for each one to swap out?
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-200105-8545@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
[not found] ` <bug-200105-8545-FomWhXSVhq@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2018-07-20 8:19 ` [Bug 200105] High paging activity as soon as the swap is touched (with steps and code to reproduce it) john terragon
2018-07-21 14:39 ` Daniel Jordan
2018-07-21 14:43 ` Daniel Jordan
2018-07-21 20:09 ` john terragon
2018-07-23 13:02 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10 1:35 ` Daniel Jordan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71c2d8a5-c29e-9284-67ab-bde6d3f0122e@gmail.com \
--to=lkmldmj@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=terragonjohn@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).