linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jordan <lkmldmj@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: john terragon <terragonjohn@yahoo.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org"
	<bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 200105] High paging activity as soon as the swap is touched (with steps and code to reproduce it)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:35:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71c2d8a5-c29e-9284-67ab-bde6d3f0122e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723130235.GF31229@dhcp22.suse.cz>



On 7/23/18 9:02 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [I am really sorry to be slow on responding]
> 
> On Sat 21-07-18 10:39:05, Daniel Jordan wrote:
>> John's issue only happens using a LUKS encrypted swap partition,
>> unencrypted swap or swap encrypted without LUKS works fine.
>>
>> In one test (out5.txt) where most system memory is taken by anon pages
>> beforehand, the heavy direct reclaim that Michal noticed lasts for 24
>> seconds, during which on average if I've crunched my numbers right,
>> John's test program was allocating at 4MiB/s, the system overall
>> (pgalloc_normal) was allocating at 235MiB/s, and the system was
>> swapping out (pswpout) at 673MiB/s. pgalloc_normal and pswpout stay
>> roughly the same each second, no big swings.
>>
>> Is the disparity between allocation and swapout rate expected?
>>
>> John ran perf during another test right before the last test program
>> was started (this doesn't include the initial large allocation
>> bringing the system close to swapping).  The top five allocators
>> (kmem:mm_page_alloc):
>>
>> # Overhead      Pid:Command
>> # ........  .......................
>> #
>>      48.45%     2005:memeater     # the test program
>>      32.08%       73:kswapd0
>>       3.16%     1957:perf_4.17
>>       1.41%     1748:watch
>>       1.16%     2043:free
> 
> Huh, kswapd allocating memory sounds really wrong here. Is it possible
> that the swap device driver is double buffering and allocating a new
> page for each one to swap out?
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-10  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-200105-8545@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <bug-200105-8545-FomWhXSVhq@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2018-07-20  8:19   ` [Bug 200105] High paging activity as soon as the swap is touched (with steps and code to reproduce it) john terragon
2018-07-21 14:39     ` Daniel Jordan
2018-07-21 14:43       ` Daniel Jordan
2018-07-21 20:09       ` john terragon
2018-07-23 13:02       ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-10  1:35         ` Daniel Jordan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71c2d8a5-c29e-9284-67ab-bde6d3f0122e@gmail.com \
    --to=lkmldmj@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=terragonjohn@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).