linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add further core files to mm core section
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:10:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <727b5e89-89d7-4abf-a93c-8d6f2cb2c438@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250616203844.566056-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

On 16.06.25 22:38, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> There are a number of files which don't quite belong anywhere else, so
> place them in the core section. If we determine in future they belong
> elsewhere we can update incrementally but it is preferable that we assign
> each file to a section as best we can.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
> REVIEWERS - let me know if these seem appropriate, I'm eyeballing
> this. even if they are not quite best placed a 'best effort' is still
> worthwhile so we establish a place to put all mm files, we can always
> incrementally update these later.
> 
>   MAINTAINERS | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 4523a6409186..a61d56bd7aa4 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -15740,10 +15740,6 @@ F:	include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
>   F:	include/linux/memory-tiers.h
>   F:	include/linux/mempolicy.h
>   F:	include/linux/mempool.h
> -F:	include/linux/memremap.h
> -F:	include/linux/mmzone.h
> -F:	include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> -F:	include/linux/pagewalk.h
>   F:	include/trace/events/ksm.h
>   F:	mm/
>   F:	tools/mm/

Probably better to have some section than none ... was just briefly 
wondering if "CORE" is the right section for some of that. Some of that 
might be better of in a "MM MISC" section, maybe.

> @@ -15764,16 +15760,40 @@ S:	Maintained
>   W:	http://www.linux-mm.org
>   T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
>   F:	include/linux/memory.h
> +F:	include/linux/memremap.h
>   F:	include/linux/mm.h
>   F:	include/linux/mm_*.h
>   F:	include/linux/mmdebug.h
> +F:	include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
> +F:	include/linux/mmzone.h
>   F:	include/linux/pagewalk.h
>   F:	kernel/fork.c
>   F:	mm/Kconfig
>   F:	mm/debug.c
> +F:	mm/debug_page_ref.c
> +F:	mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c

Wondering if there should be a MM DEBUG section. But then, no idea who 
in their right mind would be willing to maintain that ;)

> +F:	mm/folio-compat.c
> +F:	mm/highmem.c
>   F:	mm/init-mm.c
> +F:	mm/internal.h
> +F:	mm/interval_tree.c
 > +F:	mm/io-mapping.c> +F:	mm/ioremap.c
> +F:	mm/list_lru.c

Smells like reclaim/memcg.

> +F:	mm/maccess.c
 > +F:	mm/mapping_dirty_helpers.c
 >   F:	mm/memory.c> +F:	mm/memremap.c

memory hotplug related. Well, one could argue that it's just a memory 
hotplug user. It's mostly ZONE_DEVICE handling. Wonder if that would be
worth a separate section ...

> +F:	mm/mmu_notifier.c
> +F:	mm/mmzone.c
 > +F:	mm/oom_kill.c

This contains quite some meat. I wonder if a OOM section would be 
appropriate (Michal, I'm looking at you :) )


-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-16 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-16 20:38 [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add further core files to mm core section Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-16 21:10 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-06-16 22:56   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-06-17 15:22     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 17:51       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-06-17 17:55         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17  3:53   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-17  7:59     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 15:04       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 15:46         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-22 13:53     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-22 14:22       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23  5:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 15:26   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-19  5:31     ` Alistair Popple
2025-06-17 18:47   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=727b5e89-89d7-4abf-a93c-8d6f2cb2c438@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).