From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap()
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:28:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72874bf7-d2f7-4bb9-9211-804533bd5c19@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525-batch-tlb-flush-v4-4-83789d6abc00@icloud.com>
On 5/25/26 16:57, Zhang Peng wrote:
> shrink_folio_list() contains a self-contained block that sets up
> TTU flags and calls try_to_unmap(), accounting for failures via
> reclaim_stat. Extract it into folio_try_unmap() to reduce the size
> of shrink_folio_list() and make the unmap step independently readable.
>
> folio_try_unmap() is only called when the folio is actually mapped;
> the !folio_mapped() check stays in the caller, keeping the function's
> semantics clear: it tries to unmap a mapped folio and returns whether
> the unmap succeeded.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 456d38eb172c..abf3a2878456 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1221,6 +1221,41 @@ static bool pageout_one(struct folio *folio,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static bool folio_try_unmap(struct folio *folio, struct reclaim_stat *stat,
> + unsigned int nr_pages)
Two tabs.
folio_try_unmap() vs. try_to_unmap() Hm.
Again, maybe we should throw in a "for_reclaim" ?
folio_try_unmap_for_reclaim() ?
Not sure.
> +{
> + enum ttu_flags flags = TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
> + bool was_swapbacked;
> +
> + was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
const bool was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
> + if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> + flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> + /*
> + * Without TTU_SYNC, try_to_unmap will only begin to
> + * hold PTL from the first present PTE within a large
> + * folio. Some initial PTEs might be skipped due to
> + * races with parallel PTE writes in which PTEs can be
> + * cleared temporarily before being written new present
> + * values. This will lead to a large folio is still
> + * mapped while some subpages have been partially
> + * unmapped after try_to_unmap; TTU_SYNC helps
> + * try_to_unmap acquire PTL from the first PTE,
> + * eliminating the influence of temporary PTE values.
> + */
Comment can now use less LOC.
> + if (folio_test_large(folio))
> + flags |= TTU_SYNC;
> +
> + try_to_unmap(folio, flags);
> + if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> + stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
> + if (!was_swapbacked &&
> + folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
Probably best in a single line.
> + stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
> + return false;
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Reclaimed folios are counted in the return value.
> */
> @@ -1495,36 +1530,9 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
> * The folio is mapped into the page tables of one or more
> * processes. Try to unmap it here.
> */
> - if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> - enum ttu_flags flags = TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
> - bool was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
> -
> - if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> - flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> - /*
> - * Without TTU_SYNC, try_to_unmap will only begin to
> - * hold PTL from the first present PTE within a large
> - * folio. Some initial PTEs might be skipped due to
> - * races with parallel PTE writes in which PTEs can be
> - * cleared temporarily before being written new present
> - * values. This will lead to a large folio is still
> - * mapped while some subpages have been partially
> - * unmapped after try_to_unmap; TTU_SYNC helps
> - * try_to_unmap acquire PTL from the first PTE,
> - * eliminating the influence of temporary PTE values.
> - */
> - if (folio_test_large(folio))
> - flags |= TTU_SYNC;
> -
> - try_to_unmap(folio, flags);
> - if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> - stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
> - if (!was_swapbacked &&
> - folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> - stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
> - goto activate_locked;
> - }
> - }
> + if (folio_mapped(folio) &&
> + !folio_try_unmap(folio, stat, nr_pages))
Probably best in a single line.
> + goto activate_locked;
>
> /*
> * Folio is unmapped now so it cannot be newly pinned anymore.
>
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 14:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Zhang Peng
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/vmscan: introduce folio_activate_locked() helper Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 11:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio_free() from shrink_folio_list() Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-17 12:24 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract pageout_one() " Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-17 12:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72874bf7-d2f7-4bb9-9211-804533bd5c19@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox