Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap()
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:28:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <72874bf7-d2f7-4bb9-9211-804533bd5c19@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525-batch-tlb-flush-v4-4-83789d6abc00@icloud.com>

On 5/25/26 16:57, Zhang Peng wrote:
> shrink_folio_list() contains a self-contained block that sets up
> TTU flags and calls try_to_unmap(), accounting for failures via
> reclaim_stat. Extract it into folio_try_unmap() to reduce the size
> of shrink_folio_list() and make the unmap step independently readable.
> 
> folio_try_unmap() is only called when the folio is actually mapped;
> the !folio_mapped() check stays in the caller, keeping the function's
> semantics clear: it tries to unmap a mapped folio and returns whether
> the unmap succeeded.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 456d38eb172c..abf3a2878456 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1221,6 +1221,41 @@ static bool pageout_one(struct folio *folio,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static bool folio_try_unmap(struct folio *folio, struct reclaim_stat *stat,
> +			    unsigned int nr_pages)

Two tabs.

folio_try_unmap() vs. try_to_unmap() Hm.

Again, maybe we should throw in a "for_reclaim" ?

folio_try_unmap_for_reclaim() ?

Not sure.

> +{
> +	enum ttu_flags flags = TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
> +	bool was_swapbacked;
> +
> +	was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);


const bool was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);

> +	if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> +		flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> +	/*
> +	 * Without TTU_SYNC, try_to_unmap will only begin to
> +	 * hold PTL from the first present PTE within a large
> +	 * folio. Some initial PTEs might be skipped due to
> +	 * races with parallel PTE writes in which PTEs can be
> +	 * cleared temporarily before being written new present
> +	 * values. This will lead to a large folio is still
> +	 * mapped while some subpages have been partially
> +	 * unmapped after try_to_unmap; TTU_SYNC helps
> +	 * try_to_unmap acquire PTL from the first PTE,
> +	 * eliminating the influence of temporary PTE values.
> +	 */

Comment can now use less LOC.

> +	if (folio_test_large(folio))
> +		flags |= TTU_SYNC;
> +
> +	try_to_unmap(folio, flags);
> +	if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> +		stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
> +		if (!was_swapbacked &&
> +		    folio_test_swapbacked(folio))

Probably best in a single line.

> +			stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Reclaimed folios are counted in the return value.
>   */
> @@ -1495,36 +1530,9 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
>  		 * The folio is mapped into the page tables of one or more
>  		 * processes. Try to unmap it here.
>  		 */
> -		if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> -			enum ttu_flags flags = TTU_BATCH_FLUSH;
> -			bool was_swapbacked = folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
> -
> -			if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> -				flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> -			/*
> -			 * Without TTU_SYNC, try_to_unmap will only begin to
> -			 * hold PTL from the first present PTE within a large
> -			 * folio. Some initial PTEs might be skipped due to
> -			 * races with parallel PTE writes in which PTEs can be
> -			 * cleared temporarily before being written new present
> -			 * values. This will lead to a large folio is still
> -			 * mapped while some subpages have been partially
> -			 * unmapped after try_to_unmap; TTU_SYNC helps
> -			 * try_to_unmap acquire PTL from the first PTE,
> -			 * eliminating the influence of temporary PTE values.
> -			 */
> -			if (folio_test_large(folio))
> -				flags |= TTU_SYNC;
> -
> -			try_to_unmap(folio, flags);
> -			if (folio_mapped(folio)) {
> -				stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages;
> -				if (!was_swapbacked &&
> -				    folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
> -					stat->nr_lazyfree_fail += nr_pages;
> -				goto activate_locked;
> -			}
> -		}
> +		if (folio_mapped(folio) &&
> +		    !folio_try_unmap(folio, stat, nr_pages))

Probably best in a single line.

> +			goto activate_locked;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Folio is unmapped now so it cannot be newly pinned anymore.
> 


-- 
Cheers,

David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-17 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25 14:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Zhang Peng
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/vmscan: introduce folio_activate_locked() helper Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 11:59   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio_free() from shrink_folio_list() Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:17   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-17 12:24     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract pageout_one() " Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:19   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-17 12:25     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:28   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions Zhang Peng
2026-06-17 12:47   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-25 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=72874bf7-d2f7-4bb9-9211-804533bd5c19@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox