From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Longlong Xia <xialonglong2025@163.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (Arm)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Longlong Xia <xialonglong@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/ksm: validate KSM rmap items before hwpoison kill
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 14:19:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72f017f2-89c5-4e4a-9ce3-ab79f70b04a0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803151151.3472893-1-xialonglong2025@163.com>
On 8/3/26 17:11, Longlong Xia wrote:
> From: Longlong Xia <xialonglong@kylinos.cn>
>
> collect_procs_ksm() walks the stable-node rmap list and queues an
> early kill for every task whose mm appears on the anon_vma chain.
>
> That rmap item can be stale by the time memory failure handles the
> poisoned KSM page. A VMA may have been split, unmapped or remapped
> after the rmap item was recorded, so matching only vma->vm_mm can send
> SIGBUS with an address that no longer maps the poisoned page.
>
> Check that the saved address still belongs to the VMA and that
> page_vma_mapped_walk() still finds the poisoned page there before
> adding the task to the kill list.
>
> Fixes: 4248d0083ec5 ("mm: ksm: support hwpoison for ksm page")
> Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <xialonglong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> mm/ksm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 7d5b76478f0b..bc4b2dd894d8 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -3222,6 +3222,27 @@ void rmap_walk_ksm(struct folio *folio, struct rmap_walk_control *rwc)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> +static bool ksm_rmap_item_mapped(const struct page *page,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr)
Two tab indent on second parameter line
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
> + .pfn = page_to_pfn(page),
> + .nr_pages = 1,
> + .vma = vma,
> + .address = addr,
> + .flags = PVMW_SYNC,
> + };
> +
> + if (addr < vma->vm_start || addr >= vma->vm_end)
> + return false;
> + if (!page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw))
> + return false;
> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
> +
We have page_mapped_in_vma(). So I wonder whether we can find a way to
1) Modify to just work with KSM (CCing Lorenzo)
Maybe it already does. I'm confused as so often.
Looking at the existing caller collect_procs_anon(), it's really only called
on anon folios. Could it already be called on KSM folios? What would happen
in that case? (does it just work because folio->index is still what we expect)
2) Do the following
diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
index d7670ba4147bf..7eeb3c336cfe9 100644
--- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
+++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
@@ -342,6 +342,27 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
+static unsigned long page_mapped_in_vma_at_address(const struct page *page,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ const struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
+ struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
+ .pfn = page_to_pfn(page),
+ .nr_pages = 1,
+ .vma = vma,
+ .address = addr,
+ .flags = PVMW_SYNC,
+ };
+
+ if (addr < vma->vm_start || addr >= vma->vm_end)
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (!page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
+out:
+ return pvmw.address;
+}
+
/**
* page_mapped_in_vma - check whether a page is really mapped in a VMA
* @page: the page to test
@@ -355,21 +376,10 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
unsigned long page_mapped_in_vma(const struct page *page,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
- const struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
- struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
- .pfn = page_to_pfn(page),
- .nr_pages = 1,
- .vma = vma,
- .flags = PVMW_SYNC,
- };
+ const unsigned long addr = vma_address(vma, page_pgoff(folio, page), 1);
- pvmw.address = vma_address(vma, page_pgoff(folio, page), 1);
- if (pvmw.address == -EFAULT)
- goto out;
- if (!page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw))
+ if (addr == -EFAULT)
return -EFAULT;
- page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
-out:
- return pvmw.address;
+ return page_mapped_in_vma_at_address(page, vma, addr);
}
#endif
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Collect processes when the error hit an ksm page.
> */
> @@ -3237,13 +3258,13 @@ void collect_procs_ksm(const struct folio *folio, const struct page *page,
> if (!stable_node)
> return;
> hlist_for_each_entry(rmap_item, &stable_node->hlist, hlist) {
> + unsigned long addr = rmap_item->address & PAGE_MASK;
Can be const.
> struct anon_vma *av = rmap_item->anon_vma;
>
> anon_vma_lock_read(av);
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_process(tsk) {
> struct anon_vma_chain *vmac;
> - unsigned long addr;
> struct task_struct *t =
> task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
> if (!t)
> @@ -3253,7 +3274,9 @@ void collect_procs_ksm(const struct folio *folio, const struct page *page,
> {
> vma = vmac->vma;
> if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm) {
> - addr = rmap_item->address & PAGE_MASK;
> + if (!ksm_rmap_item_mapped(page, vma,
> + addr))
jut put that onto a single line, please: easier to read.
> + continue;
> add_to_kill_ksm(t, page, vma, to_kill,
> addr);
> }
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 15:11 [PATCH 1/1] mm/ksm: validate KSM rmap items before hwpoison kill Longlong Xia
2026-08-05 12:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-08-05 16:21 ` Longlong Xia
2026-08-05 16:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-05 16:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Longlong Xia
2026-08-05 16:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-06 7:48 ` Longlong Xia
2026-08-06 9:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-06 9:19 ` Longlong Xia
2026-08-06 8:35 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72f017f2-89c5-4e4a-9ce3-ab79f70b04a0@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=xialonglong2025@163.com \
--cc=xialonglong@kylinos.cn \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox