linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	jack@suse.cz, mawilcox@microsoft.com, jglisse@redhat.com,
	Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	osalvador@techadventures.net, yasu.isimatu@gmail.com,
	malat@debian.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: inititalize struct pages when adding a section
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 20:01:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7461eb4b-7069-a494-27e3-68c4e1b65a81@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGM2reYOat1bxBi0KCZAKrh0YS2PX=w-AkpesuuNVY26SSDu9A@mail.gmail.com>

On 27.07.2018 19:25, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:55 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Right now, struct pages are inititalized when memory is onlined, not
>> when it is added (since commit d0dc12e86b31 ("mm/memory_hotplug: optimize
>> memory hotplug")).
>>
>> remove_memory() will call arch_remove_memory(). Here, we usually access
>> the struct page to get the zone of the pages.
>>
>> So effectively, we access stale struct pages in case we remove memory that
>> was never onlined.
> 
> Yeah, this is a bug, thank you for catching it.
> 
>> So let's simply inititalize them earlier, when the
>> memory is added. We only have to take care of updating the zone once we
>> know it. We can use a dummy zone for that purpose.
>>
>> So effectively, all pages will already be initialized and set to
>> reserved after memory was added but before it was onlined (and even the
>> memblock is added). We only inititalize pages once, to not degrade
>> performance.
> 
> Yes, but we still add one more npages loop, so there will be some
> performance degradation, but not severe.
> 
> There are many conflicts with linux-next, please sync before sending
> out next patch.

Indeed, although I rebased, I was working on a branch based on Linus
tree ...

[...]

>>  not_early:
>>                 page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> -               __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid);
>> -               if (context == MEMMAP_HOTPLUG)
>> -                       SetPageReserved(page);
>> +               if (context == MEMMAP_HOTPLUG) {
>> +                       /* everything but the zone was inititalized */
>> +                       set_page_zone(page, zone);
>> +                       set_page_virtual(page, zone);
>> +               } else
>> +                       init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid);
>>
> 
> Please add a new function:
> memmap_init_zone_hotplug() that will handle only the zone and virtual
> fields for onlined hotplug memory.
> 
> Please remove: "enum memmap_context context" from everywhere.

All your comments make sense. Will look into the details next week and
send a new version.

Thanks and enjoy your weekend!


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-27 16:54 [PATCH v1] mm: inititalize struct pages when adding a section David Hildenbrand
2018-07-27 17:25 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-27 18:01   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-07-30 11:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 11:53   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-07-30 12:05     ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 12:11       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-07-30 13:30         ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-30 13:51           ` David Hildenbrand
2018-07-30 14:10             ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 14:42               ` David Hildenbrand
2018-07-30 14:50                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-30 15:03                   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-07-30 15:45                     ` Pavel Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7461eb4b-7069-a494-27e3-68c4e1b65a81@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=malat@debian.org \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@techadventures.net \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).