From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, smuchun@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: memory_hotplug: introduce SECTION_CANNOT_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:39:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79a1ca29-de8e-6456-460b-a9099340fec4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqwtCu2Ura+skV3B@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>
On 17.06.22 09:28, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 07:46:53AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:30:33AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> IIRC, that was used to skip these patches on the offlining path before
>>> we provided the ranges to offline_pages().
>>
>> Yeah, it was designed for that purpose back then.
>>
>>> I'd not mess with PG_reserved, and give them a clearer name, to not
>>> confuse them with other, ordinary, vmemmap pages that are not
>>> self-hosted (maybe in the future we might want to flag all vmemmap pages
>>> with a new type?).
>>
>> Not sure whether a new type is really needed, or to put it another way, I
>> cannot see the benefit.
>>
>>>
>>> I'd just try reusing the flag PG_owner_priv_1. And eventually, flag all
>>> (v)memmap pages with a type PG_memmap. However, the latter would be
>>> optional and might not be strictly required
>>>
>>>
>>> So what think could make sense is
>>>
>>> /* vmemmap pages that are self-hosted and cannot be optimized/freed. */
>>> PG_vmemmap_self_hosted = PG_owner_priv_1,
>>
>> Sure, I just lightly tested the below, and seems to work, but not sure
>> whether that is what you are referring to.
>> @Munchun: thoughts?
>>
>
> I think it works and fits my requirement.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> index e66f7aa3191d..a4556afd7bda 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> @@ -193,6 +193,11 @@ enum pageflags {
>>
>> /* Only valid for buddy pages. Used to track pages that are reported */
>> PG_reported = PG_uptodate,
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> + /* For self-hosted memmap pages */
>> + PG_vmemmap_self_hosted = PG_owner_priv_1,
>> +#endif
>> };
>>
>> #define PAGEFLAGS_MASK ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1)
>> @@ -628,6 +633,10 @@ PAGEFLAG_FALSE(SkipKASanPoison, skip_kasan_poison)
>> */
>> __PAGEFLAG(Reported, reported, PF_NO_COMPOUND)
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> +PAGEFLAG(Vmemmap_self_hosted, vmemmap_self_hosted, PF_ANY)
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /*
>> * On an anonymous page mapped into a user virtual memory area,
>> * page->mapping points to its anon_vma, not to a struct address_space;
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> index 1089ea8a9c98..e2de7ed27e9e 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> @@ -101,6 +101,14 @@ void hugetlb_vmemmap_free(struct hstate *h, struct page *head)
>> {
>> unsigned long vmemmap_addr = (unsigned long)head;
>> unsigned long vmemmap_end, vmemmap_reuse, vmemmap_pages;
>> + struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(page_to_pfn(head));
>> + struct page *memmap;
>> +
>> + memmap = sparse_decode_mem_map(ms->section_mem_map,
>> + pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(head)));
>> +
>> + if (PageVmemmap_self_hosted(memmap))
>> + return;
>
> I think here needs a loop if it is a 1GB page (spans multiple sections).
> Right? Here is an implementation based on another approach. But I think
> your implementation is more simpler and efficient. Would you mind me
> squash your diff into my patch and with your "Co-developed-by"?
Due to hugtlb alignment requirements, and the vmemmap pages being at the
start of the hotplugged memory region, I think that cannot currently
happen. Checking the first vmemmap page might be good enough for now,
and probably for the future.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 2:55 [PATCH v2 0/2] make hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap compatible with memmap_on_memory Muchun Song
2022-05-20 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: memory_hotplug: enumerate all supported section flags Muchun Song
2022-06-15 9:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-15 13:02 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-20 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: memory_hotplug: introduce SECTION_CANNOT_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP Muchun Song
2022-06-15 9:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-16 2:45 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-16 7:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-16 10:16 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-16 3:57 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-16 7:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-17 5:46 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-17 7:28 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-17 7:39 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-06-17 9:10 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-17 9:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-17 9:40 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-17 9:48 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-17 7:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-17 9:54 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-17 10:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-17 10:49 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-17 11:19 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-18 5:49 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=79a1ca29-de8e-6456-460b-a9099340fec4@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=smuchun@gmail.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).