linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	npiggin@suse.de, chris.mason@oracle.com, kurt.hackel@oracle.com,
	dave.mccracken@oracle.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	tmem-devel@oss.oracle.com, sunil.mushran@oracle.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Himanshu Raj <rhim@microsoft.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC] transcendent memory for Linux
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:02:38 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79a405e4-3c4c-4194-aed4-a3832c6c5d6e@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4A95D8.6020708@goop.org>

> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [mailto:jeremy@goop.org]
> On 06/30/09 14:21, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > No, the uuid can't be verified.  Tmem gives no indication
> > as to whether a newly-created pool is already in use (shared)
> > by another guest.  So without both the 128-bit uuid and an
> > already-in-use 64-bit object id and 32-bit page index, no data
> > is readable or writable by the attacker.
> 
> You have to consider things like timing attacks as well (for 
> example, a
> tmem hypercall might return faster if the uuid already exists).
> 
> Besides, you can tell whether a uuid exists, by at least a couple of
> mechanisms (from a quick read of the source, so I might have 
> overlooked something):

All of these still require a large number of guesses
across a 128-bit space of possible uuids, right?
It should be easy to implement "guess limits" in xen
that disable tmem use by a guest if it fails too many guesses.
I'm a bit more worried about:

> You also have to consider the case of a domain which was once part of
> the ocfs cluster, but now is not - it may still know the uuid, but not
> be otherwise allowed to use the cluster.

But on the other hand, the security model here can be that
if a trusted entity becomes untrusted, you have to change
the locks.

> Yeah, a shared namespace of accessible objects is an entirely 
> new thing
> in the Xen universe.  I would also drop Xen support until 
> there's a good
> security story about how they can be used.

While I agree that the security is not bulletproof, I wonder
if this position might be a bit extreme.  Certainly, the NSA
should not turn on tmem in a cluster, but that doesn't mean that
nobody should be allowed to.  I really suspect that there are
less costly / more rewarding attack vectors at several layers
in the hardware/software stack of most clusters.

Dan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-19 23:53 [RFC] transcendent memory for Linux Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-20  1:35 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] transcendent memory ("tmem") " Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-20  1:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] tmem: infrastructure for tmem layer Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-20  1:50   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-20  1:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] tmem: precache implementation (layered on tmem) Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-20  2:28   ` Rik van Riel
2009-06-20  1:36 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] tmem: preswap " Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-20  1:36 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] tmem: interface code for tmem on top of xen Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-22 11:27 ` [RFC] transcendent memory for Linux Martin Schwidefsky
2009-06-22 20:41   ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-22 14:31 ` Chris Friesen
2009-06-22 20:50   ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-24 15:04 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-29 14:34   ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-29 20:36     ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-29 21:13       ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-29 21:23         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-29 21:57           ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-29 22:15             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-30 21:21               ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-30 22:46                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-01 23:02                   ` Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2009-07-01 23:31                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-07-02  6:38                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-07-02 14:03                       ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-06-27 13:18 ` Linus Walleij
2009-06-28  7:42   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-29 14:44   ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-07-01  3:41     ` Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79a405e4-3c4c-4194-aed4-a3832c6c5d6e@default \
    --to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.mccracken@oracle.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rhim@microsoft.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
    --cc=tmem-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).