Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/mmu_gather: send tlb_remove_table_smp_sync IPI only to MM CPUs

[ypodemsk@redhat.com]

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 10:42 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/20/23 07:46, Yair Podemsky wrote:
> > -void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS
> > +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK mm_cpumask(mm)
> > +#else
> > +#define REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK cpu_online_mask
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS */
> > +
> > +void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  {
> >  	/*
> >  	 * This isn't an RCU grace period and hence the page-tables
> > cannot be
> > @@ -200,7 +206,8 @@ void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
> >  	 * It is however sufficient for software page-table walkers
> > that rely on
> >  	 * IRQ disabling.
> >  	 */
> > -	smp_call_function(tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL, 1);
> > +	on_each_cpu_mask(REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK,
> > tlb_remove_table_smp_sync,
> > +			NULL, true);
> >  }
> 
> That "REMOVE_TABLE_IPI_MASK" thing is pretty confusing.  It *looks*
> like
> a constant.  It does *NOT* look at all like it consumes 'mm'.  Worst
> case, just create a local variable:
> 
> 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS))
> 		ipi_mask = mm_cpumask(mm);
> 	else
> 		ipi_mask = cpu_online_mask;
> 
> 	on_each_cpu_mask(ipi_mask, ...);
> 
> That's a billion times more clear and it'll compile down to the same
> thing.
> 
> I do think the CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPUMASK_BITS naming is also pretty
> confusing, but I don't have any better suggestions.  Maybe something
> with "MM_CPUMASK" in it?
> 

Hi Dave,
Thanks for your suggestions!
I will send a new version with the local variable as you suggested
soon.
As for the config name, what about CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MM_CPUMASK?
Thanks,
Yair