From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: ranxiaokai627@163.com, hughd@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn,
"leitao@debian.org >> Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: huge_memory: refactor thpsize_shmem_enabled_store() with sysfs_match_string()
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 11:04:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b8cb44c-a098-4430-a8ef-142fa7a19087@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512120557.49995-1-ranxiaokai627@163.com>
CC Breno and Lorenzo
On 5/12/26 8:05 PM, ranxiaokai627@163.com wrote:
> From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
>
> Inspired by commit 82d9ff648c6c ("mm: huge_memory: refactor
> anon_enabled_store() with set_anon_enabled_mode()"), refactor
> thpsize_shmem_enabled_store() using sysfs_match_string().
> This eliminates the duplicated spin_lock/unlock(), set/clear_bit(),
> calls across all branches, reducing code duplication.
>
> Tested with selftests ./run_kselftest.sh -t mm:ksft_thp.sh,
> all test cases passed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> ---
Thanks for doing this.
> mm/shmem.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 3b5dc21b323c..0cc7872cc576 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -5526,6 +5526,29 @@ static ssize_t shmem_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct kobj_attribute shmem_enabled_attr = __ATTR_RW(shmem_enabled);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(huge_shmem_orders_lock);
>
> +enum huge_shmem_enabled_mode {
> + HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ALWAYS = 0,
> + HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT,
> + HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_WITHIN_SIZE,
> + HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ADVISE,
> + HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_NEVER,
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const huge_shmem_enabled_mode_strings[] = {
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ALWAYS] = "always",
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT] = "inherit",
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_WITHIN_SIZE] = "within_size",
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ADVISE] = "advise",
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_NEVER] = "never",
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned long * const huge_shmem_orders_by_mode[] = {
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ALWAYS] = &huge_shmem_orders_always,
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT] = &huge_shmem_orders_inherit,
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_WITHIN_SIZE] = &huge_shmem_orders_within_size,
> + [HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ADVISE] = &huge_shmem_orders_madvise,
> +};
> +
> static ssize_t thpsize_shmem_enabled_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> @@ -5551,57 +5574,32 @@ static ssize_t thpsize_shmem_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> int order = to_thpsize(kobj)->order;
> + int mode, m;
> ssize_t ret = count;
> + int err;
>
> - if (sysfs_streq(buf, "always")) {
> - spin_lock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_inherit);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_madvise);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_within_size);
> - set_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_always);
> - spin_unlock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "inherit")) {
> - /* Do not override huge allocation policy with non-PMD sized mTHP */
> - if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE && !is_pmd_order(order))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + mode = sysfs_match_string(huge_shmem_enabled_mode_strings, buf);
> + if (mode < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - spin_lock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_always);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_madvise);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_within_size);
> - set_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_inherit);
> - spin_unlock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "within_size")) {
> - spin_lock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_always);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_inherit);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_madvise);
> - set_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_within_size);
> - spin_unlock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "advise")) {
> - spin_lock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_always);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_inherit);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_within_size);
> - set_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_madvise);
> - spin_unlock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "never")) {
> - spin_lock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_always);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_inherit);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_within_size);
> - clear_bit(order, &huge_shmem_orders_madvise);
> - spin_unlock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> - } else {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + /* Do not override huge allocation policy with non-PMD sized mTHP */
> + if (mode == HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT &&
> + shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE && !is_pmd_order(order))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + spin_lock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
> + for (m = 0; m < ARRAY_SIZE(huge_shmem_orders_by_mode); m++) {
> + if (m == mode)
> + set_bit(order, huge_shmem_orders_by_mode[m]);
> + else
> + clear_bit(order, huge_shmem_orders_by_mode[m]);
> }
We are already under the lock, so you can use non-atomic functions like
commit 82d9ff648c6c does: __test_and_set_bit/__test_and_clear_bit.
> + spin_unlock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
>
> - if (ret > 0) {
> - int err = start_stop_khugepaged();
> + err = start_stop_khugepaged();
> + if (err)
Moreover, I think we can follow commit 82d9ff648c6c's approach: if
nothing changed, we don't need to call start_stop_khugepaged().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 12:05 [PATCH 1/2] mm: huge_memory: refactor thpsize_shmem_enabled_store() with sysfs_match_string() ranxiaokai627
2026-05-12 12:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: huge_memory: refactor thpsize_shmem_enabled_show() with helper arrays ranxiaokai627
2026-05-13 3:04 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2026-05-13 8:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: huge_memory: refactor thpsize_shmem_enabled_store() with sysfs_match_string() ranxiaokai627
2026-05-13 8:56 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-13 9:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-05-13 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-13 9:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-05-13 10:09 ` ranxiaokai627
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b8cb44c-a098-4430-a8ef-142fa7a19087@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ranxiaokai627@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox