From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: "Helge Deller" <deller@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux parisc List" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Mina Almasry" <almasrymina@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND][RFC] Fix 32-bit boot failure due inaccurate page_pool_page_is_pp()
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e48c00a-5273-4de1-a2b6-8c122127160b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMSni79s6vCCVCFO@p100>
On 13/09/2025 01.06, Helge Deller wrote:
> Commit ee62ce7a1d90 ("page_pool: Track DMA-mapped pages and unmap them when
> destroying the pool") changed PP_MAGIC_MASK from 0xFFFFFFFC to 0xc000007c on
> 32-bit platforms.
>
> The function page_pool_page_is_pp() uses PP_MAGIC_MASK to identify page pool
> pages, but the remaining bits are not sufficient to unambiguously identify
> such pages any longer.
>
Function netmem_is_pp[1] uses same kind of check against PP_MAGIC_MASK.
The call-site skb_pp_recycle[2] is protected by skb->pp_recycle check.
BUT napi_pp_put_page[3] callers have been expanded, and I'm uncertain if
they will be affected by this. (Cc Mina)
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.7/source/net/core/netmem_priv.h#L23-L26
[2]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.7/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L1009
[3]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.7/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L991-L995
> So page_pool_page_is_pp() now sometimes wrongly reports pages as page pool
> pages and as such triggers a kernel BUG as it believes it found a page pool
> leak.
>
This sounds scary to me, as netstack (see above code examples) also uses
checks against PP_MAGIC_MASK (+ PP_SIGNATURE). I hope these checks
isn't also subject to this issue(!?)
(To Toke:) Did we steal too many bits for PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK?
> There are patches upcoming where page_pool_page_is_pp() will not depend on
> PP_MAGIC_MASK and instead use page flags to identify page pool pages. Until
> those patches are merged, the easiest temporary fix is to disable the check
> on 32-bit platforms.
>
> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Linux parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.15+
> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg5849623.html
> Fixes: ee62ce7a1d90 ("page_pool: Track DMA-mapped pages and unmap them when destroying the pool")
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 1ae97a0b8ec7..f3822ae70a81 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -4190,7 +4190,7 @@ int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status);
> */
> #define PP_MAGIC_MASK ~(PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK | 0x3UL)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(const struct page *page)
> {
> treturn (page->pp_magic & PP_MAGIC_MASK) == PP_SIGNATURE;
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
Looks like your email got truncated.
--Jesper
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-12 23:06 [PATCH][RESEND][RFC] Fix 32-bit boot failure due inaccurate page_pool_page_is_pp() Helge Deller
2025-09-14 17:06 ` Christoph Biedl
2025-09-15 9:45 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2025-09-15 11:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-15 13:08 ` Helge Deller
2025-09-15 20:41 ` Mina Almasry
2025-09-15 23:51 ` Mina Almasry
2025-09-16 9:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-16 22:21 ` Mina Almasry
2025-09-17 6:27 ` Helge Deller
2025-09-17 10:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-18 0:28 ` Mina Almasry
2025-09-22 15:49 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e48c00a-5273-4de1-a2b6-8c122127160b@kernel.org \
--to=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=deller@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).