From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71748C5DF94 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2D50E6B009D; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:49:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 284956B009F; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:49:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 19DF56B00A0; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:49:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CDC6B009D for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA30640224 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 85126618626.17.8629BCE Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-159.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.159]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF758A0004 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=nYreJTyj; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of roman.gushchin@linux.dev designates 95.215.58.159 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roman.gushchin@linux.dev ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1787348972; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=5gB0/eoQgChB7MUzoYvGQXG/r+CKbSdsXnZ3NssqdGU=; b=4cViLNGDa6EfNaVsx3ecNhMiXfRJm2lq72thkg9OOq6Y5SPQP84XtQQ9akUZYAC7Miem5U Z5qLSqS41/5bmGNmdBLUo/mwiZlnFRZSgiE4nHvojgYtjAIn9gw1TtXAIQUgQWaKQIdYMZ eI4cJBKr8AyO3WJayoy7YZZNrTE43vM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=nYreJTyj; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of roman.gushchin@linux.dev designates 95.215.58.159 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roman.gushchin@linux.dev ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; cv=none; t=1787348972; b=RHxT5PSrXoLUhISAgphxJmPHTcc4p4HeglCYyyUAgYntWRG53+18wWDy6NqO8T1VmAthKj 06ec776nw+dKeuS9uWKr5DKga9ed8EaoJit3tfYsLDrzuTa0odDyxFR9mEWwjomnlYuNxz xktfqU6LqNRyLECtDqRkO8vbwpPx7AQ= X-Envelope-To: linux-mm@kvack.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=jXeoTgDV4DScDHzGSbrBzBDKi7kiB/EPOD+3RgYwVSI=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1787348970; v=1; x=1787953770; b=nYreJTyjav138mLIkov8roEq04Le/afrws56QwDh1mursu/ohqaetlELXU9b96VlIfhU5n9o tWL5Y4zn9iot2i+BwMOltSvl/gd1oJCECfjWotUVDi0uhpXwgru7kwymemzQH71WXnRS8D4k0CG VjUAFol0oTeki5zLSbZ7sJYg= X-Envelope-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from castle.c.googlers.com (35.203.187.139) by mta12.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 64ae4fc1d4dbb56e; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:30 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 64ae4fc1d4dbb56e X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Roman Gushchin To: John Hubbard Cc: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" , Michal Hocko , Ridong Chen , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , David Hildenbrand , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , Kairui Song , Barry Song , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ridong Chen Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type In-Reply-To: <67fc54f3-8889-4e18-b72c-e14266bd4703@nvidia.com> (John Hubbard's message of "Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:44:14 -0700") References: <20260821081741.1340277-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev> <7ia4tsonw41j.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <67fc54f3-8889-4e18-b72c-e14266bd4703@nvidia.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.15; emacs 30.2 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:26 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia4ecfrywih.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Stat-Signature: bopjwjfq6sqiowe7t6uu85yg7wmww5xp X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CF758A0004 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1787348971-285745 X-HE-Meta: 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 lKSitW/P GQlM1mJEkT6xqmCPUoFWbByMcdcpi0oqz2Z/SvumNURbegyjRwlJuaRrEAJGdQDpV9RHixtTrqhOzNILQSiIfCAp+9rxJ4jczLHNRko+qN1ldM874KpkKTU/OFLa8H3HeA9mfY5ZT9QXwf4nMPn6VBlawr7aGDIVphIPc/fzlVNeyahE5qaQ8FYuJVbqsUP5Ehz/Jm8mMwBxkZGPbTgbp287IeEWE6HOzs7OtKyTa280rWLw= Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: John Hubbard writes: > On 8/21/26 2:35 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: >> "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" writes: >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > ...>> We already had _too much work_ prior to the slopgeddon. Now we have a multiple >>> of that. >>> >>> Roman - I really think we a way of switching off the 'unrelated to your patch >>> but' stuff per-subsystem would be useful. >> >> I thought about it, but switching it off completely looks dubious to >> me. So maybe moderating it a bit can help? Like not reporting completely >> unrelated issues or at least do not report them more than once? > > Or, reporting them *once*, and not as a reply to the patch! > > After all, it's "unrelated to your patch". So then, don't pollute that > patch's review thread, right? > > That would alleviate the most infuriating part of this cycle, imho. Yes, this sounds good to me, it requires quite some work on the sashiko side, so I can't promise it tomorrow, but hopefully in few weeks. Thanks