From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx152.postini.com [74.125.245.152]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F06F6B0070 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:31:00 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <83884ff2-1a06-4d9c-a7eb-c53ab0cbb6b1@default> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Magenheimer Subject: RE: help converting zcache from sysfs to debugfs? References: <6b8ff49a-a5aa-4b9b-9425-c9bc7df35a34@default> <4FE1DFDC.1010105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE1DFDC.1010105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Seth Jennings Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Nitin Gupta , Konrad Wilk , Sasha Levin > From: Seth Jennings [mailto:sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Subject: Re: help converting zcache from sysfs to debugfs? >=20 > Something like this (untested): Nice! I also need a set for atomic_long_t. But forgive me if I nearly have a heart attack as I contemplate another chicken-and-egg scenario trying to get debugfs-support-for-atomics upstream before zcache code that depends on it. Maybe I'm a leetle bit over-sensitized to dependencies... or maybe not enough ;-) Anyway, I will probably use the ugly code and add a comment that says the code can be made cleaner when debugfs supports atomics. Thanks! Dan -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org