public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
	wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn,
	Michel Lespinasse <michel@lespinasse.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ksm: Optimize rmap_walk_ksm by passing a suitable address range
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 11:21:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8481d0dd-2471-4acc-a429-cbc02451a812@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02e1b8df-d568-8cbb-b8f6-46d5476d9d75@google.com>

On 4/5/26 06:44, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn wrote:
> 
>> From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
>>
>> Problem
>> =======
>> When available memory is extremely tight, causing KSM pages to be swapped
>> out, or when there is significant memory fragmentation and THP triggers
>> memory compaction, the system will invoke the rmap_walk_ksm function to
>> perform reverse mapping. However, we observed that this function becomes
>> particularly time-consuming when a large number of VMAs (e.g., 20,000)
>> share the same anon_vma. Through debug trace analysis, we found that most
>> of the latency occurs within anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach, leading to an
>> excessively long hold time on the anon_vma lock (even reaching 500ms or
>> more), which in turn causes upper-layer applications (waiting for the
>> anon_vma lock) to be blocked for extended periods.
>>
>> Root Cause
>> ==========
>> Further investigation revealed that 99.9% of iterations inside the
>> anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach loop are skipped due to the first check
>> "if (addr < vma->vm_start || addr >= vma->vm_end)), indicating that a large
>> number of loop iterations are ineffective. This inefficiency arises because
>> the pgoff_start and pgoff_end parameters passed to
>> anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach span the entire address space from 0 to
>> ULONG_MAX, resulting in very poor loop efficiency.
>>
>> Solution
>> ========
>> In fact, we can significantly improve performance by passing a more precise
>> range based on the given addr. Since the original pages merged by KSM
>> correspond to anonymous VMAs, the page offset can be calculated as
>> pgoff = address >> PAGE_SHIFT. Therefore, we can optimize the call by
>> defining:
>>
>> 	pgoff = rmap_item->address >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>> Performance
>> ===========
>> In our real embedded Linux environment, the measured metrcis were as
>> follows:
>>
>> 1) Time_ms: Max time for holding anon_vma lock in a single rmap_walk_ksm.
>> 2) Nr_iteration_total: The max times of iterations in a loop of anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach
>> 3) Skip_addr_out_of_range: The max times of skipping due to the first check (vma->vm_start
>>              and vma->vm_end) in a loop of anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach.
>> 4) Skip_mm_mismatch: The max times of skipping due to the second check (rmap_item->mm == vma->vm_mm)
>>              in a loop of anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach.
>>
>> The result is as follows:
>>
>>           Time_ms      Nr_iteration_total    Skip_addr_out_of_range   Skip_mm_mismatch
>> Before:  228.65       22169                 22168                    0
>> After :   0.396        3                     0                       2
>>
>> The referenced reproducer of rmap_walk_ksm can be found at:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260206151424734QIyWL_pA-1QeJPbJlUxsO@zte.com.cn/
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Wang Yaxin <wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Yaxin <wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
> 
> This is a very attractive speedup, but I believe it's flawed: in the
> special case when a range has been mremap-moved, when its anon folio
> indexes and anon_vma pgoff correspond to the original user address,
> not to the current user address.

[as discussed in earlier versions of this patch set]

mremap() breaks KSM in the range to be moved.

See prep_move_vma()->ksm_madvise(MADV_UNMERGEABLE)

So I am not sure what you say can trigger.

But I'm just scrolling by, as I'm still busy celebrating Easter :)

-- 
Cheers,

David


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-12 11:28 [PATCH v3 0/2] KSM: Optimizations for rmap_walk_ksm xu.xin16
2026-02-12 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ksm: Initialize the addr only once in rmap_walk_ksm xu.xin16
2026-02-12 11:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ksm: Optimize rmap_walk_ksm by passing a suitable address range xu.xin16
2026-02-12 12:21   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-05  4:44   ` Hugh Dickins
2026-04-05 21:01     ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-07  9:43       ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-06  1:58     ` xu.xin16
2026-04-06  5:35       ` Hugh Dickins
2026-04-07  6:21         ` xu.xin16
2026-04-07  9:36           ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-06  9:21     ` David Hildenbrand (arm) [this message]
2026-04-06  9:23       ` David Hildenbrand (arm)
2026-04-07  9:39     ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8481d0dd-2471-4acc-a429-cbc02451a812@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
    --cc=wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox