From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: hu.shengming@zte.com.cn, harry@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: hao.li@linux.dev, cl@gentwo.org, rientjes@google.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhang.run@zte.com.cn,
cai.qu@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/slub: fix lost local objects when bulk remote free batch fills
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 11:27:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84c4c2bf-397e-461c-b898-482d1a49f40b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202607062139095043SOsLi6TIf403tcjPf8fm@zte.com.cn>
On 7/6/26 15:39, hu.shengming@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
>
> In free_to_pcs_bulk(), when remote_objects[] fills to PCS_BATCH_MAX,
> the code jumps to flush_remote to free the batch. If all remote entries
> have already been compacted out of p[] via tail swaps while local objects
> remain, the flush_remote path returns early since `i < size` no longer
> holds. The leftover local objects are then neither cached in the sheaf
> nor returned to the slab freelist, causing a memory leak.
>
> For illustration:
> size = 64, local objects at p[0..31], remote objects at p[32..63]
> After scanning all remotes: i = 32, size = 32
> p[0..31] local objects are dropped.
>
> Harry pointed out that, although the logic contains a real leak, it does
> not appear to be triggerable with the current in-tree users. To hit this
> path, at least PCS_BATCH_MAX objects, currently hardcoded to 32, need to
> be collected in remote_objects[]. Looking at current kmem_cache_free_bulk()
> users:
>
> * maple_node has sheaf_capacity = 32
> * skbuff_head_cache has sheaf_capacity = 28
> * panthor and msm drivers have sheaf_capacity = 4
>
> The sheaf capacity is, at least for now, derived purely from the object
> size, with the user-requested capacity used as a minimum. Therefore, among
> the current users, only maple_node has a sheaf_capacity large enough to
> reach PCS_BATCH_MAX.
>
> However, for the bug to trigger in maple_node, all objects in the sheaf
> would have to be from remote nodes. In that case, there would be no local
> objects left to leak. So this issue was found by code review rather than
> from a runtime report, and it does not seem to be triggerable by current
> users.
>
> Still, the bug could become reachable with future users, a different sheaf
> capacity, or a change to PCS_BATCH_MAX. Fix the logic by freeing a full
> remote batch in place during the scan and then continuing to process the
> compacted array. This keeps all local objects on the normal fast path,
> while the tail path only handles any leftover partial remote batch. The
> redundant next_remote_batch jump label is removed as well.
>
> Fixes: <989b09b73978>("slab: skip percpu sheaves for remote object freeing")
Removed the < >
> Signed-off-by: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
Thanks! I added cc: stable anyway so we avoid unexpected surprises in case
something else is backported there that exposes the bug. And the fix is
small enough.
Merged to slab/for-next-fixes
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Incorporate Harry's detailed trigger condition analysis (thanks Harry)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260704160450302fnznThT3hBeBiwlhE-oGv@zte.com.cn/
>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 9f754cf1c187..4d7e3067a5d6 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -6193,7 +6193,6 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
> void *remote_objects[PCS_BATCH_MAX];
> unsigned int remote_nr = 0;
>
> -next_remote_batch:
> while (i < size) {
> struct slab *slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]);
>
> @@ -6208,8 +6207,11 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
> if (unlikely(!can_free_to_pcs(slab))) {
> remote_objects[remote_nr] = p[i];
> p[i] = p[--size];
> - if (++remote_nr >= PCS_BATCH_MAX)
> - goto flush_remote;
> + if (++remote_nr >= PCS_BATCH_MAX) {
> + __kmem_cache_free_bulk(s, remote_nr, &remote_objects[0]);
> + stat_add(s, FREE_SLOWPATH, remote_nr);
> + remote_nr = 0;
> + }
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -6293,10 +6295,6 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
> if (remote_nr) {
> __kmem_cache_free_bulk(s, remote_nr, &remote_objects[0]);
> stat_add(s, FREE_SLOWPATH, remote_nr);
> - if (i < size) {
> - remote_nr = 0;
> - goto next_remote_batch;
> - }
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 13:39 [PATCH v2] mm/slub: fix lost local objects when bulk remote free batch fills hu.shengming
2026-07-07 9:27 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-07-07 15:38 ` hu.shengming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84c4c2bf-397e-461c-b898-482d1a49f40b@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai.qu@zte.com.cn \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=zhang.run@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox