Re: [PATCH] "fork: reorder function qualifiers for copy_clone_args_from_user"

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 16.07.25 11:35, Dishank Jogi wrote:

"" in patch subject is weird

> Change the order of function qualifiers from 'noinline static' to 'static noinline'
> in copy_clone_args_from_user for consistency with kernel coding style.
> 
> This is a non-functional change intended to improve readability and maintain
> consistent ordering of qualifiers across the codebase.

Simplify to "No functional change intended." All the other stuff can be 
dropped from this sentence IMHO -- I'd even drop the whole sentence.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dishank Jogi <dishank.jogi@siqol.com>
> ---
>   kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 1ee8eb11f38b..574ff0d983db 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -2743,7 +2743,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(clone, unsigned long, clone_flags, unsigned long, newsp,
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> -noinline static int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
> +static noinline int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
>   					      struct clone_args __user *uargs,
>   					      size_t usize)
>   {

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb