From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08ECC4338F for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E078610D0 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:08:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3E078610D0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CE0CB6B006C; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:08:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C69F46B0071; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:08:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B0AD88D0001; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:08:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0135.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.135]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9252C6B006C for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:08:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379321694C for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:08:49 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78513481578.31.CE712F5 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24E8501DB3D for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33D2C610E6; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1629893328; bh=FIFl9ZJpPgUJdHEDp/lmt+sw2tTDcKmFcMfQHZaov/E=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M7D6yPvBkKIKjPdUOz94jWfmtGYV35KIJmOHAwq79SUVjmln091edxptunoGWqdiS MAwA7V/nP2c/NNPYCqKN/QIa72l2DJtqu6oib5djyoQsY1lc83+H+qR52ADheuB4KF X0d/5aKd2Yz3ihkG8BjKKlrN7+H1AD3RiU2jJeHGGO7QqtN0+Uyi7ZEtiz/fvCq8A7 mSCzdKDoZ+keom6JK45cRzjx1yQeTlti0y742kJQXAhAuSd3JmI+kfB3O3o+SFx2hu qbFLND6zO8Yh0AFEpub5gK1tFWe6Fp5pFpTzQt6Ie7x0R0BMoDuIMan+LDqLwGqmHP 3GSaOOjkk/jaQ== Message-ID: <85cc13e120734cc10aaf47b2bb12d65ec9e75f93.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Memory folios for v5.15 From: Jeff Layton To: David Howells , Theodore Ts'o Cc: Linus Torvalds , Matthew Wilcox , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:08:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1974380.1629840723@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <1957060.1629820467@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1967090.1629833687@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1974380.1629840723@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 (3.40.4-1.fc34) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=M7D6yPvB; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of jlayton@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jlayton@kernel.org X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C24E8501DB3D X-Stat-Signature: qytztstic6oits9brqtf4yqdr6pmcsob X-HE-Tag: 1629893328-189370 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 22:32 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > What do you think of "struct pageset"? Not quite as short as folios, > > but it's clearer. > > Fine by me (I suggested page_set), and as Vlastimil points out, the current > usage of the name could be renamed. > I honestly fail to see how any of this is better than "folio". It's just a name, and "folio" has the advantage of being fairly unique. The greppability that Willy mentioned is a perk, but folio also doesn't sound similar to other words when discussing them verbally. That's another advantage. If I say "pageset" in a conversation, do I mean "struct pageset" or "a random set of pages"? If I say "folio", it's much more clear to what I'm referring. We've had a lot of time to get used to "page" as a term of art. We'd get used to folio too. -- Jeff Layton