From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
"Herton R . Krzesinski" <herton@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joel Savitz <jsavitz@redhat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] oom_kill.c: futex: Delay the OOM reaper to allow time for proper futex cleanup
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:40:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k2mts8p.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220414144042.677008-1-npache@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 14 2022 at 10:40, Nico Pache wrote:
> The pthread struct is allocated on PRIVATE|ANONYMOUS memory [1] which can
> be targeted by the oom reaper. This mapping is used to store the futex
> robust list head; the kernel does not keep a copy of the robust list and
> instead references a userspace address to maintain the robustness during
> a process death. A race can occur between exit_mm and the oom reaper that
> allows the oom reaper to free the memory of the futex robust list before
> the exit path has handled the futex death:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> page_fault
> do_exit "signal"
> wake_oom_reaper
> oom_reaper
> oom_reap_task_mm (invalidates mm)
> exit_mm
> exit_mm_release
> futex_exit_release
> futex_cleanup
> exit_robust_list
> get_user (EFAULT- can't access memory)
>
> If the get_user EFAULT's, the kernel will be unable to recover the
> waiters on the robust_list, leaving userspace mutexes hung indefinitely.
>
> Delay the OOM reaper, allowing more time for the exit path to perform
> the futex cleanup.
>
> Reproducer: https://gitlab.com/jsavitz/oom_futex_reproducer
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/glibc/latest/source/nptl/allocatestack.c#L370
A link to the original discussion about this would be more useful than a
code reference which is stale tomorrow. The above explanation is good
enough to describe the problem.
>
> +/*
> + * Give the OOM victim time to exit naturally before invoking the oom_reaping.
> + * The timers timeout is arbitrary... the longer it is, the longer the worst
> + * case scenario for the OOM can take. If it is too small, the oom_reaper can
> + * get in the way and release resources needed by the process exit path.
> + * e.g. The futex robust list can sit in Anon|Private memory that gets reaped
> + * before the exit path is able to wake the futex waiters.
> + */
> +#define OOM_REAPER_DELAY (2*HZ)
> +static void queue_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
Bah. Did you run out of newlines? Glueing that define between the
comment and the function is unreadable.
Other than that.
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-14 14:40 [PATCH v9] oom_kill.c: futex: Delay the OOM reaper to allow time for proper futex cleanup Nico Pache
2022-04-20 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-21 14:40 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-04-21 16:25 ` Nico Pache
2022-04-21 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-21 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874k2mts8p.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=herton@redhat.com \
--cc=jsavitz@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).