From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bootmem2 III
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874p92qsvn.fsf@saeurebad.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48275493.40601@firstfloor.org> (Andi Kleen's message of "Sun, 11 May 2008 22:18:27 +0200")
Hi,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 05:17:13PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>>> here is bootmem2, a memory block-oriented boot time allocator.
>>>>
>>>> Recent NUMA topologies broke the current bootmem's assumption that
>>>> memory nodes provide non-overlapping and contiguous ranges of pages.
>>> I'm still not sure that's a really good rationale for bootmem2.
>>> e.g. the non continuous nodes are really special cases and there tends
>>> to be enough memory at the beginning which is enough for boot time
>>> use, so for those systems it would be quite reasonably to only
>>> put the continuous starts of the nodes into bootmem.
>>
>> Hm, that would put the logic into arch-code. I have no strong opinion
>> about it.
>
> In fact I suspect the current code will already work like that
> implicitely. The aliasing is only a problem for the new "arbitary node
> free_bootmem" right?
And that alloc_bootmem_node() can not garuantee node-locality which is
the much worse part, I think.
>>> That said the bootmem code has gotten a little crufty and a clean
>>> rewrite might be a good idea.
>>
>> I agree completely.
>
> The trouble is just that bootmem is used in early boot and early boot is
> very subtle and getting it working over all architectures could be a
> challenge. Not wanting to discourage you, but it's not exactly the
> easiest part of the kernel to hack on.
Bootmem seemed pretty self-contained to me, at least in the beginning.
The bad thing is that I can test only the most simple configuration with
it.
I was wondering yesterday if it would be feasible to enforce
contiguousness for nodes. So that arch-code does not create one pgdat
for each node but one for each contiguous block. I have not yet looked
deeper into it, but I suspect that other mm code has similar problems
with nodes spanning other nodes.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 15:17 [PATCH 0/3] bootmem2 III Johannes Weiner
2008-05-09 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: Make NR_NODE_MEMBLKS global Johannes Weiner
2008-05-09 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: bootmem2 Johannes Weiner
2008-05-09 15:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Migrate X86_32 to bootmem2 Johannes Weiner
2008-05-09 18:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] bootmem2 III Andi Kleen
2008-05-11 19:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-11 20:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-13 12:40 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2008-05-13 12:59 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 19:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-15 19:12 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-05-16 20:42 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874p92qsvn.fsf@saeurebad.de \
--to=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).