linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 16:01:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bm6zaa04.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d62c9e2-375b-2791-32ce-fdaa7e7664fd@intel.com> (Dave Hansen's message of "Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:57:51 -0800")

* Dave Hansen:

> On 11/8/18 4:05 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Would it be possible to reserve a bit for PKEY_DISABLE_READ?
>> 
>> I think the POWER implementation can disable read access at the hardware
>> level, but not write access, and that cannot be expressed with the
>> current PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE bits.
>
> Do you just mean in the syscall interfaces?  What would we need to do on
> x86 if we see the bit?  Would we just say it's invalid on x86, or would
> we make sure that PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS==PKEY_DISABLE_READ?

Ideally, PKEY_DISABLE_READ | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE and PKEY_DISABLE_READ |
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS would be treated as PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS both, and a
line PKEY_DISABLE_READ would result in an EINVAL failure.

Thanks,
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-08 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08 12:05 pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 14:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 15:01   ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-11-08 17:14     ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 17:37       ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 20:12         ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:23           ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-09 18:09             ` Ram Pai
2018-11-12 12:00               ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-27 10:23                 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-27 11:57                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-27 15:31                     ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-29 11:37                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-03  4:02                         ` Ram Pai
2018-12-03 15:52                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-04  6:23                             ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 13:00                               ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-05 20:23                                 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 16:21                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-05 20:36                             ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:08       ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:11         ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 20:14         ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 19:22 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-12 10:29   ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bm6zaa04.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).