From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 16:01:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bm6zaa04.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d62c9e2-375b-2791-32ce-fdaa7e7664fd@intel.com> (Dave Hansen's message of "Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:57:51 -0800")
* Dave Hansen:
> On 11/8/18 4:05 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Would it be possible to reserve a bit for PKEY_DISABLE_READ?
>>
>> I think the POWER implementation can disable read access at the hardware
>> level, but not write access, and that cannot be expressed with the
>> current PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE bits.
>
> Do you just mean in the syscall interfaces? What would we need to do on
> x86 if we see the bit? Would we just say it's invalid on x86, or would
> we make sure that PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS==PKEY_DISABLE_READ?
Ideally, PKEY_DISABLE_READ | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE and PKEY_DISABLE_READ |
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS would be treated as PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS both, and a
line PKEY_DISABLE_READ would result in an EINVAL failure.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-08 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 12:05 pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 14:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 15:01 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-11-08 17:14 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 17:37 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 20:12 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:23 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-09 18:09 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-12 12:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-27 10:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-27 11:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-27 15:31 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-29 11:37 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-03 4:02 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-03 15:52 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-04 6:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 13:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-05 20:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 16:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-05 20:36 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:08 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:11 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 20:14 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 19:22 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-12 10:29 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bm6zaa04.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).