Re: [RFC v7 26/25] mm/mprotect, powerpc/mm/pkeys, x86/mm/pkeys: Add sysfs interface

[Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:34:43PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Expose useful information for programs using memory protection keys.
>> Provide implementation for powerpc and x86.
>> 
>> On a powerpc system with pkeys support, here is what is shown:
>> 
>> $ head /sys/kernel/mm/protection_keys/*
>> ==> /sys/kernel/mm/protection_keys/disable_execute_supported <==
>> true
>
> We should not just call out disable_execute_supported.
> disable_access_supported and disable_write_supported should also 
> be called out.

Ok, will do in the next version.

>> ==> /sys/kernel/mm/protection_keys/total_keys <==
>> 32
>> 
>
>> ==> /sys/kernel/mm/protection_keys/usable_keys <==
>> 30
>
> This is little nebulous.  It depends on how we define
> usable as.  Is it the number of keys that are available
> to the app?  If that is the case that value is dynamic.
> Sometime the OS steals one key for execute-only key.
> And anything that is dynamic can be inherently racy.
> So I think we should define 'usable' as guaranteed number
> of keys available to the app

Yes, that is how I defined it: the difference between the number of keys
provided by the platform and the keys reserved by the OS. I do need to
spell it out somewhere inside Documentation/ though.

> and display a value that is one less than what is available.
>
> in the above example the value should be 29.

Good point, I didn't account for the execute-only key. I will make that
change in the next version.

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>