From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com [209.85.192.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5177D6B0007 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 00:30:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id g15-v6so593403pfh.10 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 21:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com. [192.55.52.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4-v6si37883894pgs.16.2018.06.04.21.30.14 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jun 2018 21:30:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Huang\, Ying" Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -V3 00/21] mm, THP, swap: Swapout/swapin THP in one piece References: <20180523082625.6897-1-ying.huang@intel.com> <20180604180642.qexvwe5dqvkgraij@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:30:13 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20180604180642.qexvwe5dqvkgraij@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> (Daniel Jordan's message of "Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:06:42 -0700") Message-ID: <87lgbt3ley.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Daniel Jordan Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Jordan writes: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:26:04PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: >> And for all, Any comment is welcome! >> >> This patchset is based on the 2018-05-18 head of mmotm/master. > > Trying to review this and it doesn't apply to mmotm-2018-05-18-16-44. git > fails on patch 10: > > Applying: mm, THP, swap: Support to count THP swapin and its fallback > error: Documentation/vm/transhuge.rst: does not exist in index > Patch failed at 0010 mm, THP, swap: Support to count THP swapin and its fallback > > Sure enough, this tag has Documentation/vm/transhuge.txt but not the .rst > version. Was this the tag you meant? If so did you pull in some of Mike > Rapoport's doc changes on top? I use the mmotm tree at git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git Maybe you are using the other one? >> base optimized >> ---------------- -------------------------- >> %stddev %change %stddev >> \ | \ >> 1417897 2% +992.8% 15494673 vm-scalability.throughput >> 1020489 4% +1091.2% 12156349 vmstat.swap.si >> 1255093 3% +940.3% 13056114 vmstat.swap.so >> 1259769 7% +1818.3% 24166779 meminfo.AnonHugePages >> 28021761 -10.7% 25018848 2% meminfo.AnonPages >> 64080064 4% -95.6% 2787565 33% interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 13.91 5% -13.8 0.10 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath >> > ...snip... >> test, while in optimized kernel, that is 96.6%. The TLB flushing IPI >> (represented as interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts) reduced >> 95.6%, while cycles for spinlock reduced from 13.9% to 0.1%. These >> are performance benefit of THP swapout/swapin too. > > Which spinlocks are we spending less time on? "perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock_irq.mem_cgroup_commit_charge.do_swap_page.__handle_mm_fault": 4.39, "perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.free_pcppages_bulk.drain_pages_zone.drain_pages": 1.53, "perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.get_page_from_freelist.__alloc_pages_slowpath.__alloc_pages_nodemask": 1.34, "perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock.swapcache_free_entries.free_swap_slot.do_swap_page": 1.02, "perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock_irq.shrink_inactive_list.shrink_node_memcg.shrink_node": 0.61, "perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath._raw_spin_lock_irq.shrink_active_list.shrink_node_memcg.shrink_node": 0.54, Best Regards, Huang, Ying