linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:43:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87li3dvz3k.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377883120-5280-2-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>

Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> writes:

> Currently all of page table handling by hugetlbfs code are done under
> mm->page_table_lock. So when a process have many threads and they heavily
> access to the memory, lock contention happens and impacts the performance.
>
> This patch makes hugepage support split page table lock so that we use
> page->ptl of the leaf node of page table tree which is pte for normal pages
> but can be pmd and/or pud for hugepages of some architectures.
>
> ChangeLog v2:
>  - add split ptl on other archs missed in v1
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c |  6 ++-
>  arch/tile/mm/hugetlbpage.c    |  6 ++-
>  include/linux/hugetlb.h       | 20 ++++++++++
>  mm/hugetlb.c                  | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  mm/mempolicy.c                |  5 ++-
>  mm/migrate.c                  |  4 +-
>  mm/rmap.c                     |  2 +-
>  7 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git v3.11-rc3.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c v3.11-rc3/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index d67db4b..7e56cb7 100644
> --- v3.11-rc3.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ v3.11-rc3/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ static int __hugepte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, hugepd_t *hpdp,
>  {
>  	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
>  	pte_t *new;
> +	spinlock_t *ptl;
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
>  	int i;
> @@ -141,7 +142,8 @@ static int __hugepte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, hugepd_t *hpdp,
>  	if (! new)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> -	spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> +	ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(mm, new);
> +	spin_lock(ptl);


Are you sure we can do that for ppc ?
	new = kmem_cache_zalloc(cachep, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT);

The page for new(pte_t) could be shared right ? which mean a deadlock ?

May be you should do it at the pmd level itself for ppc

>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
>  	/*
>  	 * We have multiple higher-level entries that point to the same
> @@ -174,7 +176,7 @@ static int __hugepte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, hugepd_t *hpdp,
>  #endif
>  	}
>  #endif
> -	spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(ptl);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>


-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-04  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-30 17:18 [PATCH 0/2 v2] split page table lock for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-30 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-04  7:13   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2013-09-04 16:32     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-05  9:18       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-05 15:23         ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-30 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] thp: " Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-02 10:53   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-02 16:37     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-03 20:52   ` Naoya Horiguchi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-05 21:27 [PATCH 0/2 v3] split page table lock for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-08 16:53   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-09 16:26     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-05-28 19:52 [PATCH 0/2] " Naoya Horiguchi
2013-05-28 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Naoya Horiguchi
2013-05-29  1:09   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-05-29  1:09   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-03 13:19   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 14:34     ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-06-03 15:42       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87li3dvz3k.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).