From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:43:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87li3dvz3k.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377883120-5280-2-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> writes:
> Currently all of page table handling by hugetlbfs code are done under
> mm->page_table_lock. So when a process have many threads and they heavily
> access to the memory, lock contention happens and impacts the performance.
>
> This patch makes hugepage support split page table lock so that we use
> page->ptl of the leaf node of page table tree which is pte for normal pages
> but can be pmd and/or pud for hugepages of some architectures.
>
> ChangeLog v2:
> - add split ptl on other archs missed in v1
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 6 ++-
> arch/tile/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 6 ++-
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 20 ++++++++++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> mm/mempolicy.c | 5 ++-
> mm/migrate.c | 4 +-
> mm/rmap.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git v3.11-rc3.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c v3.11-rc3/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index d67db4b..7e56cb7 100644
> --- v3.11-rc3.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ v3.11-rc3/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ static int __hugepte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, hugepd_t *hpdp,
> {
> struct kmem_cache *cachep;
> pte_t *new;
> + spinlock_t *ptl;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
> int i;
> @@ -141,7 +142,8 @@ static int __hugepte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, hugepd_t *hpdp,
> if (! new)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> + ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(mm, new);
> + spin_lock(ptl);
Are you sure we can do that for ppc ?
new = kmem_cache_zalloc(cachep, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT);
The page for new(pte_t) could be shared right ? which mean a deadlock ?
May be you should do it at the pmd level itself for ppc
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
> /*
> * We have multiple higher-level entries that point to the same
> @@ -174,7 +176,7 @@ static int __hugepte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, hugepd_t *hpdp,
> #endif
> }
> #endif
> - spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> + spin_unlock(ptl);
> return 0;
> }
>
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-30 17:18 [PATCH 0/2 v2] split page table lock for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-30 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-04 7:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2013-09-04 16:32 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-05 9:18 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-05 15:23 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-08-30 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] thp: " Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-02 10:53 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-02 16:37 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-03 20:52 ` Naoya Horiguchi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-05 21:27 [PATCH 0/2 v3] split page table lock for hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugetlbfs: support split page table lock Naoya Horiguchi
2013-09-08 16:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-09 16:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-05-28 19:52 [PATCH 0/2] " Naoya Horiguchi
2013-05-28 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Naoya Horiguchi
2013-05-29 1:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-05-29 1:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-03 13:19 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 14:34 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-06-03 15:42 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87li3dvz3k.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).