From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BA2B8D0017 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:21:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so1011362qwh.14 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:21:01 -0800 (PST) From: Ben Gamari Subject: Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof) In-Reply-To: <20101114140920.E013.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20101109162525.BC87.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <877hgmr72o.fsf@gmail.com> <20101114140920.E013.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:20:57 -0500 Message-ID: <87y68wiipy.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rsync@lists.samba.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :) > Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my personal needs so I'll shut up now. Thanks! - Ben -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org