From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Vratislav Bendel <vbendel@redhat.com>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@samsung.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: migrate: don't rely on PageMovable() of newpage after unlocking it
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:01:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8830012a-1fc6-f937-d72c-b61af03d5913@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129071837.GZ18811@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 29.01.19 08:18, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 28-01-19 22:09:14, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 28.01.19 21:19, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> David, could you reformulate the changelog accordingly please? My ack
>>> still holds.
>>
>> You mean reformulating + resending for stable kernels only?
>
> I would merge your patch even if it doesn't fix any real problem _now_.
> If for not other reasons it makes the code less subtle because we no
> longer depend on this crazy __PageMovable is special. If the movable
> flag is supposed to be synchronized with the page lock then do not do
> tricks and make code more robust because the next time somebody would
> like to fix up the current semantic he might reintroduce the bug easily.
>
Sounds good to me, I'll rephrase and resend. I'll also have a look if I
can easily refactor the whole PageMovable logic or if this is more involved.
Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 16:04 [PATCH v1] mm: migrate: don't rely on PageMovable() of newpage after unlocking it David Hildenbrand
2019-01-28 16:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-01-28 20:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-01-28 20:19 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 21:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-01-29 7:18 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-29 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-01-29 23:16 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-29 23:33 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8830012a-1fc6-f937-d72c-b61af03d5913@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=k.khlebnikov@samsung.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbendel@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).