public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com,
	baohua@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/huge_memory: fix folio isn't locked in softleaf_to_folio()
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 10:02:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88f37900-5c8b-4606-9081-e9b72acb0941@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318012055.3593216-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com>

On 3/18/26 02:20, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
> On arm64 server, we found folio that get from migration entry isn't locked
> in softleaf_to_folio(). This issue triggers when mTHP splitting and
> zap_nonpresent_ptes() races, and the root cause is lack of memory barrier
> in softleaf_to_folio(). The race is as follows:
> 
> 	CPU0                                             CPU1
> 
> deferred_split_scan()                              zap_nonpresent_ptes()
>   lock folio
>   split_folio()
>     unmap_folio()
>       change ptes to migration entries
>     __split_folio_to_order()                         softleaf_to_folio()
>       set flags(including PG_locked) for tail pages    folio = pfn_folio(softleaf_to_pfn(entry))
>       smp_wmb()                                        VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio))
>       prep_compound_page() for tail pages
> 
> In __split_folio_to_order(), smp_wmb() guarantees page flags of tail pages
> are visible before the tail page becomes non-compound. smp_wmb() should
> be paired with smp_rmb() in softleaf_to_folio(), which is missed. As a
> result, if zap_nonpresent_ptes() accesses migration entry that stores
> tail pfn, softleaf_to_folio() may see the updated compound_head of tail
> page before page->flags.
> 
> To fix it, add missing smp_rmb() if the softleaf entry is migration entry
> in softleaf_to_folio() and softleaf_to_page().
> 
> Fixes: e9b61f19858a ("thp: reintroduce split_huge_page()")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
> ---
> 
> Change since v1:
>  * update fix tag
>  * use helper softleaf_migration_entry_check()
> 
>  include/linux/leafops.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/leafops.h b/include/linux/leafops.h
> index a9ff94b744f2..c7dbc3fb8ab6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/leafops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/leafops.h
> @@ -363,6 +363,22 @@ static inline unsigned long softleaf_to_pfn(softleaf_t entry)
>  	return swp_offset(entry) & SWP_PFN_MASK;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void softleaf_migration_entry_check(softleaf_t entry,
> +			struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	if (!softleaf_is_migration(entry))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* See __split_folio_to_order() comment */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Any use of migration entries may only occur while the
> +	 * corresponding page is locked
> +	 */
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio));
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * softleaf_to_page() - Obtains struct page for PFN encoded within leaf entry.
>   * @entry: Leaf entry, softleaf_has_pfn(@entry) must return true.
> @@ -374,11 +390,7 @@ static inline struct page *softleaf_to_page(softleaf_t entry)
>  	struct page *page = pfn_to_page(softleaf_to_pfn(entry));
>  
>  	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!softleaf_has_pfn(entry));
> -	/*
> -	 * Any use of migration entries may only occur while the
> -	 * corresponding page is locked
> -	 */
> -	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(softleaf_is_migration(entry) && !PageLocked(page));
> +	softleaf_migration_entry_check(entry, page_folio(page));

It might be better to do

if (softleaf_is_migration(entry))
	softleaf_migration_entry_check(entry, page_folio(page));

Removing the softleaf_is_migration() check from
softleaf_migration_entry_check(). Then, we don't do the unconditional
page_folio() and don't call the function for non-migration-entries.

With that LGTM.

-- 
Cheers,

David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18  1:20 [PATCH v2] mm/huge_memory: fix folio isn't locked in softleaf_to_folio() Jinjiang Tu
2026-03-18  9:02 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-03-18  9:29   ` Jinjiang Tu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=88f37900-5c8b-4606-9081-e9b72acb0941@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox