From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.2 v4 09/12] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio()
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:54:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <896b3956-3cdc-48b5-a0a0-a3ec35aefa07@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424024915.28758-10-ziy@nvidia.com>
On 4/24/26 04:49, Zi Yan wrote:
> After READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS is removed, FS either supports large folio or
> not. folio_split() can be used on a FS with large folio support without
> worrying about getting a THP on a FS without large folio support.
>
> When READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS was present, a PMD large pagecache folio can
> appear in a FS without large folio support after khugepaged or
> madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE) creates it. During truncate_inode_partial_folio(),
> such a PMD large pagecache folio is split and if the FS does not support
> large folio, it needs to be split to order-0 ones and could not be split
> non uniformly to ones with various orders. try_folio_split_to_order() was
> added to handle this situation by checking folio_check_splittable(...,
> SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM) to detect if the large folio is created due to
> READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS and the FS does not support large folio. Now
> READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS is removed, all large pagecache folios are created
> with FSes supporting large folio, this function is no longer needed and all
> large pagecache folios can be split non uniformly.
In general looks good. Just one question:
folio_check_splittable() also rejects SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM / new_order for
swapcache pages.
It's confusing, but truncate would never stumble over such folios, correct?
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 2:49 [PATCH 7.2 v4 00/12] Remove read-only THP support for FSes without large folio support Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 01/12] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS check Zi Yan
2026-04-24 12:40 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 14:49 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-25 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-25 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-25 23:44 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 02/12] mm/khugepaged: add folio dirty check after try_to_unmap() Zi Yan
2026-04-24 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-26 6:01 ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 03/12] mm/huge_memory: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS from file_thp_enabled() Zi Yan
2026-04-24 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 14:58 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-25 14:27 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 04/12] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS check in hugepage_enabled() Zi Yan
2026-04-24 12:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 14:59 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 05/12] mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Kconfig option Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 06/12] mm: fs: remove filemap_nr_thps*() functions and their users Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 07/12] fs: remove nr_thps from struct address_space Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 08/12] mm/huge_memory: remove folio split check for READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-04-24 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 09/12] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio() Zi Yan
2026-04-24 12:54 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-24 15:07 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-24 15:12 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-24 18:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 10/12] fs/btrfs: remove a comment referring to READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 11/12] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS in khugepaged Zi Yan
2026-04-24 2:49 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 12/12] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS code from guard-regions Zi Yan
2026-04-24 12:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 10:30 ` [PATCH 7.2 v4 00/12] Remove read-only THP support for FSes without large folio support Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=896b3956-3cdc-48b5-a0a0-a3ec35aefa07@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox