From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/compaction: avoid missing last page block in section after skip offline sections
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:41:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d3f4a1d-b624-3e2f-653c-032833646dea@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728171037.2219226-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
On 28.07.23 19:10, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> skip_offline_sections_reverse will return the last pfn in found online
> section. Then we set block_start_pfn to start of page block which
> contains the last pfn in section. Then we continue, move one page
> block forward and ignore the last page block in the online section.
> Make block_start_pfn point to first page block after online section to fix
> this:
> 1. make skip_offline_sections_reverse return end pfn of online section,
> i.e. pfn of page block after online section.
> 2. assign block_start_pfn with next_pfn.
>
> Fixes: f63224525309 ("mm: compaction: skip the memory hole rapidly when isolating free pages")
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 9b7a0a69e19f..ce7841363b12 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
Can we add a short comment which kind of PFN we return (first pfn of
first offline section after an online section)?
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static unsigned long skip_offline_sections_reverse(unsigned long start_pfn)
>
> while (start_nr-- > 0) {
> if (online_section_nr(start_nr))
> - return section_nr_to_pfn(start_nr) + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1;
> + return section_nr_to_pfn(start_nr + 1);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1670,8 +1670,7 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>
> next_pfn = skip_offline_sections_reverse(block_start_pfn);
> if (next_pfn)
> - block_start_pfn = max(pageblock_start_pfn(next_pfn),
> - low_pfn);
> + block_start_pfn = max(next_pfn, low_pfn);
So block_start_pfn() will now point at the first PFN of the offline section.
Confusing stuff, but I get the idea and I think it makes sense to me :)
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 17:10 [PATCH 0/8] Fixes and cleanups to compaction Kemeng Shi
[not found] ` <20230728171037.2219226-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-07-28 10:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/compaction: remove unnecessary return for void function David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01 2:53 ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/compaction: correct last_migrated_pfn update in compact_zone Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 2:09 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 2:19 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/compaction: remove stale fast_find_block flag in isolate_migratepages Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 2:42 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 3:24 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 3:34 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 3:48 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 8:15 ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/compaction: corret comment of cached migrate pfn update Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01 2:45 ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/compaction: correct comment to complete migration failure Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/compaction: only set skip flag if cc->no_set_skip_hint is false Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01 3:02 ` Baolin Wang
[not found] ` <20230728171037.2219226-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-07-28 10:41 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-07-29 2:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/compaction: avoid missing last page block in section after skip offline sections Kemeng Shi
2023-07-31 12:01 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 2:18 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 2:36 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 3:53 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 6:08 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 8:01 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 8:42 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01 9:32 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 12:33 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-02 1:11 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-02 1:26 ` Kemeng Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d3f4a1d-b624-3e2f-653c-032833646dea@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).