From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:MEMORY MAPPING" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix regression in vrm->new_addr check
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:31:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d536d53-a365-4a9f-8d30-bbade9a85e3e@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLBn4vb0Pmwoqt51@google.com>
On 8/28/25 16:29, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 03:22:54PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 04:21:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> > On 8/28/25 07:38, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 03:26:52AM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
>> > >> Commit 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity
>> > >> checks") moved the sanity check for vrm->new_addr from mremap_to() to
>> > >> check_mremap_params().
>> > >>
>> > >> However, this caused a regression as vrm->new_addr is now checked even
>> > >> when MREMAP_FIXED and MREMAP_DONTUNMAP flags are not specified. In this
>> > >> case, vrm->new_addr can be garbage and create unexpected failures.
>> > >
>> > > Yikes, sorry my mistake.
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> Fix this by moving the new_addr check after the vrm_implies_new_addr()
>> > >> guard. This ensures that the new_addr is only checked when the user has
>> > >> specified one explicitly.
>> > >>
>> > >> Fixes: 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity checks")
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
>> > >
>> > > You need a Cc: Stable.
>> >
>> > No need as the commit being fixed is from 6.17-rc1?
>> > But it's better to use "[PATCH mm-hotfixes]" to make sure it goes to 6.17
>> > and not the next merge window.
>> >
>>
>> Ah haha really? I'm losing track of my patches.
>>
>> Yeah sure as per Vlasta then Carlos :)
>
> Oops, sorry my v2 raced with this.
Nevermind, Andrew can fixup locally. Thanks :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 3:26 [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix regression in vrm->new_addr check Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 3:43 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-08-28 4:06 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 4:16 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 5:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 14:13 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 14:29 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:31 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-08-28 14:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d536d53-a365-4a9f-8d30-bbade9a85e3e@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).