linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:40:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e1d5cce-3661-44cc-ea1c-ac754513cde4@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170814111430.lskrrg3fygpnyx6v@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>

>> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
>> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *create_object(unsigned long ptr, size_t size,
>>  
>>  	object = kmem_cache_alloc(object_cache, gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp));
>>  	if (!object) {
>> -		pr_warn("Cannot allocate a kmemleak_object structure\n");
>>  		kmemleak_disable();
> 
> I don't really get what this patch is trying to achieve.

I suggest to reduce the code size a bit.


> Given that kmemleak will be disabled after this,

I have got difficulties to interpret this information.


> I'd rather know why it happened.

Do you find the default allocation failure report sufficient?

Regards,
Markus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-14 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-14  9:33 [PATCH 0/2] kmemleak: Adjustments for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-14  9:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-14 11:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-14 11:40     ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2017-08-14 13:02     ` Dan Carpenter
2017-08-14 14:38       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-14 14:45         ` Dan Carpenter
2017-08-14  9:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] kmemleak: Use seq_puts() in print_unreferenced() SF Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8e1d5cce-3661-44cc-ea1c-ac754513cde4@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).