Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: hugetlb: soft-offline: dissolve_free_huge_page() return zero on !PageHuge

Mike Kravetz
2019-06-11T17:16:35Z

On 6/10/19 1:18 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> madvise(MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) often returns -EBUSY when calling soft offline
> for hugepages with overcommitting enabled. That was caused by the suboptimal
> code in current soft-offline code. See the following part:
>
> ret = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page, NULL, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL,
> MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_FAILURE);
> if (ret) {
> ...
> } else {
> /*
> * We set PG_hwpoison only when the migration source hugepage
> * was successfully dissolved, because otherwise hwpoisoned
> * hugepage remains on free hugepage list, then userspace will
> * find it as SIGBUS by allocation failure. That's not expected
> * in soft-offlining.
> */
> ret = dissolve_free_huge_page(page);
> if (!ret) {
> if (set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page(page))
> num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> }
> }
> return ret;
>
> Here dissolve_free_huge_page() returns -EBUSY if the migration source page
> was freed into buddy in migrate_pages(), but even in that case we actually
> has a chance that set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() succeeds. So that means
> current code gives up offlining too early now.
>
> dissolve_free_huge_page() checks that a given hugepage is suitable for
> dissolving, where we should return success for !PageHuge() case because
> the given hugepage is considered as already dissolved.
>
> This change also affects other callers of dissolve_free_huge_page(),
> which are cleaned up together.
>
> Reported-by: Chen, Jerry T <jerry.t.chen@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Chen, Jerry T <jerry.t.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> Fixes: 6bc9b56433b76 ("mm: fix race on soft-offlining")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 15 +++++++++------
> mm/memory-failure.c | 5 +----
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git v5.2-rc3/mm/hugetlb.c v5.2-rc3_patched/mm/hugetlb.c
> index ac843d3..048d071 100644
> --- v5.2-rc3/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ v5.2-rc3_patched/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1519,7 +1519,12 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)

Please update the function description for dissolve_free_huge_page() as
well. It currently says, "Returns -EBUSY if the dissolution fails because
a give page is not a free hugepage" which is no longer true as a result of
this change.

> int rc = -EBUSY;
>
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> - if (PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page)) {
> + if (!PageHuge(page)) {
> + rc = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!page_count(page)) {
> struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> struct hstate *h = page_hstate(head);
> int nid = page_to_nid(head);
> @@ -1564,11 +1569,9 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>
> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += 1 << minimum_order) {
> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> - if (PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page)) {
> - rc = dissolve_free_huge_page(page);
> - if (rc)
> - break;
> - }

We may want to consider keeping at least the PageHuge(page) check before
calling dissolve_free_huge_page(). dissolve_free_huge_pages is called as
part of memory offline processing. We do not know if the memory to be offlined
contains huge pages or not. With your changes, we are taking hugetlb_lock
on each call to dissolve_free_huge_page just to discover that the page is
not a huge page.

You 'could' add a PageHuge(page) check to dissolve_free_huge_page before
taking the lock. However, you would need to check again after taking the
lock.
--
Mike Kravetz