From: "Li Zhe" <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
To: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <apopple@nvidia.com>,
<arnd@arndb.de>, <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <david@kernel.org>,
<kees@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
<rppt@kernel.org>, <tglx@kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] x86/string: extend memcpy_flushcache() fixed-size fastpaths
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 19:04:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94d6172a-b7a5-4eac-96b3-15cc83d424b3@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804203508.GEanJM_LGXmItYhFKZ@fat_crate.local>
On 8/5/26 4:35 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 03:09:29PM +0800, Li Zhe wrote:
>> Tested in a VM with a 100 GB fsdax namespace device configured with
>> map=dev and a 100 GB devdax namespace (align=2097152) on Intel Ice Lake
>> server.
>>
>> Test procedure:
>> Rebind the nd_pmem and dax_pmem drivers 30 times and collect the memmap
>> initialization time from the pr_debug() output of
>> memmap_init_zone_device().
>>
>> With memcpy_nontemporal() used by the ZONE_DEVICE template-copy path:
>> Average of rebinds for nd_pmem driver: 150.83 ms
>> Average of rebinds for dax_pmem driver: 153.55 ms
>>
>> With this x86 fixed-size fastpath patch applied:
>> Average of rebinds for nd_pmem driver: 96.79 ms
>> Average of rebinds for dax_pmem driver: 119.04 ms
>>
>> This further reduces the average memmap initialization time measured
>> during rebind by about 35.8% for nd_pmem and 22.5% for dax_pmem.
> Testing methodology doesn't usually belong in the commit message but under the
> "---" lines below but this is important enough to keep it here.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> A quick and untested cleanup ontop with the potential for a bunch more
> unification. But later.
>
> Note that you're inconsistent about the "memory" clobber. The current code
> doesn't have it, you're adding it to movnti_8(). I've added it now everywhere
> to be on the safe side - it would be interesting to know whether you see any
> perf difference with and without it in your use case.
>
> Thx.
Thanks, I will fold the cleaned-up version into v10.
I also tested the memcpy_flushcache() fixed-size path with and without
the "memory" clobber. In this build, the generated assembly for this
path is the same in both cases.
I also ran the ZONE_DEVICE rebind test with both variants. The difference
was below 1% for both nd_pmem and dax_pmem, with no stable direction, so
I do not see a measurable performance difference from the "memory"
clobber in this use case.
Given that, I will keep the clobber for consistency and safety.
Thanks,
Zhe
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> index bc6a9f34b346..3a1e1f17431b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,14 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY_FLUSHCACHE 1
> void __memcpy_flushcache(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt);
>
> +static __always_inline void movnti_4(void *dst, const void *src)
> +{
> + asm volatile("movntil %1, %0"
> + : "=m"(*(u32 *)dst)
> + : "r"(*(u32 *)src)
> + : "memory");
> +}
> +
> static __always_inline void movnti_8(void *dst, const void *src)
> {
> asm volatile("movntiq %1, %0"
> @@ -112,47 +120,26 @@ static __always_inline void movnti_64(void *dst, const void *src)
> static __always_inline void memcpy_flushcache(void *dst, const void *src,
> size_t cnt)
> {
> - if (__builtin_constant_p(cnt)) {
> - switch (cnt) {
> - case 4:
> - asm ("movntil %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u32 *)dst) : "r"(*(u32 *)src));
> - return;
> - case 8:
> - asm ("movntiq %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u64 *)dst) : "r"(*(u64 *)src));
> - return;
> - case 16:
> - asm ("movntiq %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u64 *)dst) : "r"(*(u64 *)src));
> - asm ("movntiq %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u64 *)(dst + 8)) : "r"(*(u64 *)(src + 8)));
> - return;
> - /*
> - * The relevant fixed-size copies here are the
> - * x86_64 struct page sizes: 64, 80, and 96 bytes.
> - * Keep 32-byte and 48-byte copies inline as well
> - * instead of sending those nearby fixed-size
> - * cases back to __memcpy_flushcache().
> - */
> - case 32:
> - movnti_32(dst, src);
> - return;
> - case 48:
> - movnti_32(dst, src);
> - movnti_16(dst + 32, src + 32);
> - return;
> - case 64:
> - movnti_64(dst, src);
> - return;
> - case 80:
> - movnti_64(dst, src);
> - movnti_16(dst + 64, src + 64);
> - return;
> - case 96:
> - movnti_64(dst, src);
> - movnti_32(dst + 64, src + 64);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (!__builtin_constant_p(cnt))
> + return __memcpy_flushcache(dst, src, cnt);
> +
> + /*
> + * The relevant fixed-size copies here are the x86_64 struct page sizes:
> + * 64, 80, and 96 bytes. Keep 32-byte and 48-byte copies inline as well
> + * instead of sending those nearby fixed-size cases back to
> + * __memcpy_flushcache().
> + */
> + switch (cnt) {
> + case 4: movnti_4(dst, src); break;
> + case 8: movnti_8(dst, src); break;
> + case 16: movnti_16(dst, src); break;
> + case 32: movnti_32(dst, src); break;
> + case 48: movnti_32(dst, src); movnti_16(dst + 32, src + 32); break;
> + case 64: movnti_64(dst, src); break;
> + case 80: movnti_64(dst, src); movnti_16(dst + 64, src + 64); break;
> + case 96: movnti_64(dst, src); movnti_32(dst + 64, src + 64); break;
> + default: __memcpy_flushcache(dst, src, cnt); break;
> }
> -
> - __memcpy_flushcache(dst, src, cnt);
> }
>
> #define memcpy_nontemporal memcpy_nontemporal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 7:09 [PATCH v9 0/8] mm: optimize zone-device memmap initialization Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] mm: fix stale ZONE_DEVICE refcount comment Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] mm: factor zone-device page init helpers out of __init_zone_device_page Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] mm: add a set_page_section_from_pfn() helper Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] mm: add a template-based fast path for zone-device page init Li Zhe
2026-08-03 8:39 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-05 9:50 ` Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] mm: extend the template fast path to zone-device compound tails Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] string: introduce memcpy_nontemporal() Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] mm: use memcpy_nontemporal() in zone-device template copies Li Zhe
2026-08-03 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] x86/string: extend memcpy_flushcache() fixed-size fastpaths Li Zhe
2026-08-04 20:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-05 11:04 ` Li Zhe [this message]
2026-08-03 21:40 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] mm: optimize zone-device memmap initialization Andrew Morton
2026-08-05 9:49 ` Li Zhe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94d6172a-b7a5-4eac-96b3-15cc83d424b3@bytedance.com \
--to=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox