linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] tools: Add sheaves support to testing infrastructure
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:59:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95413138-1a9c-4b10-847d-cb37b68ba7c4@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpEsVE7Jae7PqWvgTtm38C5MPFx43+dDyYzfKLMQFuE_3A@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/22/25 18:56, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>> @@ -270,6 +276,84 @@ __kmem_cache_create_args(const char *name, unsigned int size,
>>         return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> +struct slab_sheaf *
>> +kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int size)
>> +{
>> +       struct slab_sheaf *sheaf;
>> +       unsigned int capacity;
>> +
>> +       if (size > s->sheaf_capacity)
>> +               capacity = size;
>> +       else
>> +               capacity = s->sheaf_capacity;
> 
> nit:
> capacity = max(size, s->sheaf_capacity);

OK

>> +
>> +       sheaf = malloc(sizeof(*sheaf) + sizeof(void *) * s->sheaf_capacity * capacity);
> 
> Should this really be `sizeof(void *) * s->sheaf_capacity * capacity`
> or just `sizeof(void *) * capacity` ?

Right, so the whole thing should be:
sizeof(*sheaf) + sizeof(void *) * capacity

> 
>> +       if (!sheaf) {
>> +               return NULL;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       memset(sheaf, 0, size);

This is also wrong, so I'm changing it to calloc(1, ...) to get the zeroing
there.

>> +       sheaf->cache = s;
>> +       sheaf->capacity = capacity;
>> +       sheaf->size = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(s, gfp, size, sheaf->objects);
>> +       if (!sheaf->size) {
>> +               free(sheaf);
>> +               return NULL;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return sheaf;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int kmem_cache_refill_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp,
>> +                struct slab_sheaf **sheafp, unsigned int size)
>> +{
>> +       struct slab_sheaf *sheaf = *sheafp;
>> +       int refill;
>> +
>> +       if (sheaf->size >= size)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>> +       if (size > sheaf->capacity) {
>> +               sheaf = kmem_cache_prefill_sheaf(s, gfp, size);
>> +               if (!sheaf)
>> +                       return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +               kmem_cache_return_sheaf(s, gfp, *sheafp);
>> +               *sheafp = sheaf;
>> +               return 0;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       refill = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(s, gfp, size - sheaf->size,
>> +                                      &sheaf->objects[sheaf->size]);
>> +       if (!refill)
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +       sheaf->size += refill;
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kmem_cache_return_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp,
>> +                struct slab_sheaf *sheaf)
>> +{
>> +       if (sheaf->size) {
>> +               //s->non_kernel += sheaf->size;
> 
> Above comment seems obsolete.

Ack.

> 
>> +               kmem_cache_free_bulk(s, sheaf->size, &sheaf->objects[0]);
>> +       }
>> +       free(sheaf);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void *
>> +kmem_cache_alloc_from_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp,
>> +               struct slab_sheaf *sheaf)
>> +{
>> +       if (sheaf->size == 0) {
>> +               printf("Nothing left in sheaf!\n");
>> +               return NULL;
>> +       }
>> +
> 
> Should we clear sheaf->objects[sheaf->size] for additional safety?

OK.
>> +       return sheaf->objects[--sheaf->size];
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Test the test infrastructure for kem_cache_alloc/free and bulk counterparts.
>>   */
>>
>> --
>> 2.50.1
>>



  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-26  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-23 13:34 [PATCH v5 00/14] SLUB percpu sheaves Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] slab: add opt-in caching layer of " Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-18 10:09   ` Harry Yoo
2025-08-26  8:03     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-19  4:19   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-26  8:51     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] slab: add sheaf support for batching kfree_rcu() operations Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 16:39   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-24 14:30     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-24 17:36       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] slab: sheaf prefilling for guaranteed allocations Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] slab: determine barn status racily outside of lock Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] tools: Add testing support for changes to rcu and slab for sheaves Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-22 16:28   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-26  9:32     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-27  0:19       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] tools: Add sheaves support to testing infrastructure Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-22 16:56   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-26  9:59     ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] maple_tree: use percpu sheaves for maple_node_cache Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] mm, vma: use percpu sheaves for vm_area_struct cache Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] mm, slub: skip percpu sheaves for remote object freeing Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-25  5:22   ` Harry Yoo
2025-08-26 10:11     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] mm, slab: allow NUMA restricted allocations to use percpu sheaves Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-22 19:58   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-25  6:52   ` Harry Yoo
2025-08-26 10:49     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] testing/radix-tree/maple: Increase readers and reduce delay for faster machines Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] maple_tree: Sheaf conversion Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-22 20:18   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-26 14:22     ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-08-27  2:07       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-28 14:27         ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] maple_tree: Add single node allocation support to maple state Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-22 20:25   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-26 15:10     ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-08-27  2:03       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-23 13:34 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] maple_tree: Convert forking to use the sheaf interface Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-22 20:29   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-15 22:53 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] SLUB percpu sheaves Sudarsan Mahendran
2025-08-16  8:05   ` Harry Yoo
2025-08-16 17:35     ` Sudarsan Mahendran
2025-08-16 18:31       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-16 18:33         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-17  4:28           ` Sudarsan Mahendran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95413138-1a9c-4b10-847d-cb37b68ba7c4@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).